Using learning management systems in business and economics studies in Hungarian higher education

This paper explores all uses of LMS in teaching Business Mathematics in Hungarian undergraduate training from the point of view of the instructors. Since no similar survey had been carried out in Hungary earlier, the aim was to fill in this gap and to investigate which LMS systems are being used by the instructors, to what specific purposes and how intensively. The importance of this study is that it highlights the local correlations and shortcomings thus making the adoption of LMS systems in Business Mathematics more effective. The survey was carried out by using questionnaires compiled by the author (survey method). All the institutions of Business Mathematics were questioned, one instructor in each (N = 28), so the data survey was comprehensive. The results of the article show that the proportion of instructors using LMS systems in undergraduate Business Mathematics training is lower than might be expected from the literature. Correlations have been demonstrated (elements characteristic of the country) with which the phenomena can be explained. This study shows – consistent with other studies – that LMS was commonly used by instructors for text-based communication and for delivering text-based learning materials. Even special tools and activities supporting mathematics are used for such purposes in a small number of cases; solutions outside the scope of LMS are used in a larger proportion.

[1]  Judith Schoonenboom,et al.  Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Ramon Garrote Jurado,et al.  The use of learning management systems: A Longitudinal Case Study , 2011 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[4]  B. Margot,et al.  Universities online : a survey of online education and services in Australia , 2002 .

[5]  Matt Lingard Why don’t all lecturers make use of VLEs?: what can the so-called “laggards” tell us? , 2007 .

[6]  G. Benfield,et al.  Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools , 2006 .

[7]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Rosalina Babo,et al.  Learning management systems usage on higher education institutions , 2009 .

[9]  Emin Aydin,et al.  THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: A PARADIGM SHIFT FROM "COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION" TOWARDS "STUDENT PROGRAMMING" , 2005 .

[10]  F. Bell Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning , 2011 .

[11]  Palitha Edirisingha,et al.  Introducing a VLE into Campus-Based Undergraduate Teaching: Staff Perspectives on Its Impact on Teaching , 2005 .

[12]  Françoise Blin,et al.  Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[15]  Richard Walker,et al.  A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom , 2006, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Ramon Garrote Jurado,et al.  Lecturers' attitudes about the use of learning management systems in engineering education: A Swedish case study , 2007 .

[17]  Helen Gartley,et al.  The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education , 2002 .

[18]  Wendy Bell,et al.  It's installed ... now get on with it! Looking beyond the software to the cultural change , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[20]  Martin Mulder,et al.  Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Luis E. Anido-Rifón,et al.  Educational metadata and brokerage for learning resources , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Richard Walker,et al.  2008 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK , 2008 .

[23]  Silvia Pavel,et al.  E-Learning Glossary , 2001 .

[24]  Richard Walker,et al.  The development of technology enhanced learning: findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Steve Drew,et al.  Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics' Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems , 2014 .

[27]  Stefano Renzi,et al.  Differences in university teaching after learning management system adoption , 2011, SIGWEB Newsl..

[28]  Rosalina Babo,et al.  Higher Education Institutions and Learning Management Systems: Adoption and Standardization , 2011 .

[29]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  The role of task-technology fit as users' motivation to continue information system use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Robert A. Ellis,et al.  E‐learning in higher education: some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study , 2009 .