Construction business performance measurement: the SPM alternative

Construction business performance measurement (BPM) is myopic, most often being project‐specific, profit‐orientated, and neglecting broader “stakeholder” issues. If construction organizations are to remain competitive in the longer term, they need to develop and better understand their relations with their customers, suppliers, employees, lenders and the wider community. Hence, performance measurement must embrace these broader business characteristics. The need for a shift in “orthodox” (BPM) beliefs from “basic” performance measurement, to an alternative “stakeholder perspective measurement” (SPM), is underlined. SPM will adequately consider relations with customers, suppliers, employees, financiers, and the wider community; all being critical for a business’s long‐term viability. The paper goes on to advocate that construction organizations should reject this myopic strategic thinking, and better consider the interests of their stakeholders, both economically and morally. The latter calls for development of a serious stakeholder perspective to business performance measurement, so that construction organizations can be monitored and judged in a socially acceptable manner.

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[2]  R. Johnston,et al.  Performance Measurement in Service Businesses , 1992 .

[3]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Improving service quality in America: Lessons learned , 1994 .

[4]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[5]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Approaches to Organisational Effectiveness and Their Application to Construction Organisations , 1996 .

[6]  S. Ward,et al.  Objectives and performance in construction projects , 1991 .

[7]  Chris Ashton Strategic Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[8]  B. Chakravarthy Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[9]  Nils-Göran Olve,et al.  Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard , 1999 .

[10]  E Lam,et al.  Benchmarking best practice. , 1994, Nursing times.

[11]  R. L. Price,et al.  The return map: tracking product teams. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[12]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[13]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Changing Paradigms: The Transformation of Management Knowledge for the 21st Century , 1998 .

[14]  Harry P. Hatry,et al.  Performance Measurement , 2020, Software Engineering.

[15]  Peter Armstrong,et al.  The decline of operational expertise in the knowledge-base of management accounting: An examination of some post-war trends in the qualifying requirements of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants , 1992 .

[16]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The propagation of rework benchmark metrics for construction , 1999 .