Automatic Construction of Dental Charts for Postmortem Identification

Identification of deceased individuals based on dental characteristics is receiving increased attention, especially with the large volume of victims encountered in mass disasters. An important problem in automated dental identification is automatic classification of teeth into four classes (molars, premolars, canines, and incisors). An equally important problem is the construction of a dental chart, which is a data structure that guides tooth-to-tooth matching. Dental charts are the key for avoiding illogical comparisons that inefficiently consume the limited computational resources and may mislead decision making. Labeling of the teeth is a challenging task which has received inadequate attention in the literature. We tackle this composite problem using a two-stage approach. The first stage utilizes low computational cost, appearance-based features for assigning an initial class. The second stage applies a string matching technique, based on teeth neighborhood rules, to validate initial teeth-classes and, hence, to assign each tooth a number corresponding to its location in the dental chart. Based on a large test dataset of 507 bitewing and periapical films that contain 2027 teeth, the proposed approach achieves classification accuracy of 87%. Experimental results indicate that the proposed approach works very fast, and achieves high performance compared to other approaches suggested in the literature.

[1]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[2]  Mohamed Abdel-Mottaleb,et al.  A content-based system for human identification based on bitewing dental X-ray images , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates,et al.  Algorithms for string searching , 1989, SIGF.

[4]  D. Sweet,et al.  A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity , 2001 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Matching of dental X-ray images for human identification , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Hany H. Ammar,et al.  Teeth segmentation in digitized dental X-ray films using mathematical morphology , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  A. Ross,et al.  Automatic Tooth Segmentation Using Active Contour Without Edges , 2006, 2006 Biometrics Symposium: Special Session on Research at the Biometric Consortium Conference.

[8]  Omaima Nomir,et al.  A system for human identification from X-ray dental radiographs , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  The String-to-String Correction Problem , 1974, JACM.

[10]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[11]  Christus,et al.  A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins , 2022 .

[12]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[13]  G. Seward,et al.  Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation , 1982 .

[14]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[15]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  Classification and numbering of teeth in dental bitewing images , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Hany H. Ammar,et al.  Fast and Accurate Segmentation of Dental X-Ray Records , 2006, ICB.

[18]  Hany H. Ammar,et al.  Toward an automated dental identification system , 2005, J. Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Hong Chen,et al.  Registration of dental atlas to radiographs for human identification , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .