Parallel Machine Scheduling Through Column Generation: Minimax Objective Functions

In this paper we consider one of the basic problems in scheduling and project management: scheduling on parallel identical machines. We present a solution framework for a number of scheduling problems in which the goal is to find a feasible schedule that minimizes some objective function of the minimax type on a set of parallel, identical machines, subject to release dates, deadlines, and/or generalized precedence constraints. Our framework is based on column generation. Although column generation has been successfully applied to many parallel machine scheduling problems with objective functions of the minsum type, the number of applications for minimax objective functions is still small. We determine a lower bound on the objective function in the following way. We first turn the minimization problem into a decision problem by bounding the outcome value. We then ask ourselves 'Are m machines enough to feasibly accommodate all jobs?'. We formulate this as an integer linear programming problem and we determine a high quality lower bound by applying column generation to the LP-relaxation; if this lower bound is more than m, then we can conclude infeasibility. To speed up the process, we compute an intermediate lower bound based on the outcome of the pricing problem. As the pricing problem is intractable for many variants of the original scheduling problem, we mostly solve it approximately by applying local search, but once in every 50 iterations or when local search fails, we use a time-indexed integer linear programming formulation to solve the pricing problem. After having derived the lower bound on the objective function of the original scheduling problem, we try to find a matching upper bound by identifying a feasible schedule with objective function value equal to this lower bound. Our computational results show that our lower bound is so strong that this almost always succeeds. We are able to solve problems with up to 160 jobs and 10 machines in 10 minutes on average.

[1]  J. M. Moore,et al.  A Functional Equation and its Application to Resource Allocation and Sequencing Problems , 1969 .

[2]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  One-Processor Scheduling with Symmetric Earliness and Tardiness Penalties , 1988, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  A time indexed formulation of non-preemptive single machine scheduling problems , 1992, Math. Program..

[4]  Philippe Baptiste,et al.  Constraint - based scheduling : applying constraint programming to scheduling problems , 2001 .

[5]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Linear Programming and Network Flows , 1977 .

[6]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Solving Parallel Machine Scheduling Problems by Column Generation , 1999, INFORMS J. Comput..

[7]  Han Hoogeveen,et al.  Parallel Machine Scheduling by Column Generation , 1999, Oper. Res..

[8]  J. M. van den Akker,et al.  LP-based solution methods for single-machine scheduling problems , 1994 .

[9]  Jacques Carlier,et al.  Scheduling jobs with release dates and tails on identical machines to minimize the makespan , 1987 .

[10]  Peter Brucker,et al.  A linear programming and constraint propagation-based lower bound for the RCPSP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Peter Brucker,et al.  Lower bounds for resource-constrained project scheduling problems , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Marjan van den Akker,et al.  Applying Column Generation to Machine Scheduling , 2005 .

[13]  Peter Brucker,et al.  Lower Bounds for Scheduling a Single Robot in a Job-Shop Environment , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  E.L. Lawler,et al.  Optimization and Approximation in Deterministic Sequencing and Scheduling: a Survey , 1977 .