Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa.

PURPOSE The authors quantitate the rate of visual field loss in patients with retinitis pigmentosa as it relates to different clinical field phenotypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Goldmann visual fields were obtained with target V4e in 77 patients and with target II4e in 71 patients who had either isolated or various genetic types of retinitis pigmentosa and who met certain entrance criteria. The visual fields were categorized into five distinct clinical field phenotypes on the basis of their pattern of field loss. Mixed-model methods for the analysis of longitudinal data were used to model the natural logarithm of the visual field area as a function of patient age and clinical field phenotype. The average half-life (time over which half of the remaining field area would be lost) of the visual field area for each phenotype was computed from the results of this analysis. Visual field data were not analyzed for patients with a normal clinical field phenotype (type 1). RESULTS Independent of the field phenotype, average half-life values were 7.3 years for target V4e and 6.8 years for target II4e, which were not statistically different (P = 0.16). Visual fields with partial or complete midperipheral ring scotomas (type 2) and those with only a residual central field (type 4) had a half-life of 9.5 and 9.4 years, respectively, for target V4e, and 8.9 and 8.0 years, respectively, for target II4e. Patients with partial peripheral restriction (type 5) lost visual fields with a half-life of 9.5 years for target V4e and 7.3 years for target II4e. None of these differences in the half-lives between the different phenotypes were statistically significant for either targets V4e or II4e. Fields with a residual central area and remaining temporal and/or nasal islands (type 3) had a half-life of 4.8 years for target V4e and 6.0 years for target II4e. The differences in half-lives between type 3 and each of the other field phenotypes were statistically significant for the V4e target, but not for the II4e target. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study can be useful for counseling patients with retinitis pigmentosa and various visual field phenotypes as to their potential rate of visual field loss.