Inhibition of Rumen Protozoa by Specific Inhibitors of Lysozyme and Peptidases in vitro

Defaunation studies have shown that rumen protozoa are one of the main causes of low nitrogen utilization efficiency due to their bacterivory and subsequent intraruminal cycling of microbial protein in ruminants. In genomic and transcriptomic studies, we found that rumen protozoa expressed lysozymes and peptidases at high levels. We hypothesized that specific inhibition of lysozyme and peptidases could reduce the activity and growth of rumen protozoa, which can decrease their predation of microbes and proteolysis and subsequent ammoniagenesis by rumen microbiota. To test the above hypothesis, we evaluated three specific inhibitors: imidazole (IMI), a lysozyme inhibitor; phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), a serine protease inhibitor; and iodoacetamide (IOD), a cysteine protease inhibitor; both individually and in combinations, with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a positive control. Rumen fluid was collected from two Jersey dairy cows fed either a concentrate-based dairy ration or only alfalfa hay. Each protozoa-enriched rumen fluid was incubated for 24 h with or without the aforementioned inhibitors and fed a mixture of ground wheat grain, alfalfa, and grass hays to support microbial growth. Live protozoa cells were morphologically identified and counted simultaneously at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation. Fermentation characteristics and prokaryotic composition were determined and compared at the end of the incubation. Except for IOD, all the inhibitors reduced all the nine protozoal genera identified, but to different extents, in a time-dependent manner. IOD was the least inhibitory to protozoa, but it lowered ammoniagenesis the most while not decreasing feed digestibility or concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA). ANCOM analysis identified loss of Fibrobacter and overgrowth of Treponema, Streptococcus, and Succinivibrio in several inhibitor treatments. Functional prediction (from 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences) using the CowPI database showed that the inhibitors decreased the relative abundance of the genes encoding amino acid metabolism, especially peptidases, and lysosome in the rumen microbiota. Overall, inhibition of protozoa resulted in alteration of prokaryotic microbiota and in vitro fermentation, and peptidases, especially cysteine-peptidase, may be targeted to improve nitrogen utilization in ruminants.

[1]  T. Park,et al.  Specific inhibitors of lysozyme and peptidases inhibit the growth of the rumen protozoan Entodinium caudatum without decreasing feed digestion or fermentation in vitro , 2019, Journal of applied microbiology.

[2]  Junhu Yao,et al.  Dynamics of methanogenesis, ruminal fermentation and fiber digestibility in ruminants following elimination of protozoa: a meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[3]  Francesco Asnicar,et al.  QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science , 2018 .

[4]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Aerobic cultivation of anaerobic rumen protozoa, Entodinium caudatum and Epidinium caudatum. , 2018, Journal of microbiological methods.

[5]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Do Ruminal Ciliates Select Their Preys and Prokaryotic Symbionts? , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[6]  T. Meulia,et al.  Draft Macronuclear Genome Sequence of the Ruminal Ciliate Entodinium caudatum , 2018, Microbiology Resource Announcements.

[7]  Christopher J. Creevey,et al.  CowPI: A Rumen Microbiome Focussed Version of the PICRUSt Functional Inference Software , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[8]  Benjamin D. Kaehler,et al.  Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin , 2018, Microbiome.

[9]  C. J. Newbold,et al.  Improving the antiprotozoal effect of saponins in the rumen by combination with glycosidase inhibiting iminosugars or by modification of their chemical structure , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  T. Meulia,et al.  Inhibition of the Rumen Ciliate Entodinium caudatum by Antibiotics , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[11]  L. Guan,et al.  Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  B. White,et al.  Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[13]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[14]  N. McEwan,et al.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[15]  P. B. Pope,et al.  Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Rob Knight,et al.  Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition , 2015, Microbial ecology in health and disease.

[17]  T. Hackmann,et al.  Maximizing efficiency of rumen microbial protein production , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[18]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Essential oils affect populations of some rumen bacteria in vitro as revealed by microarray (RumenBactArray) analysis , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[19]  A. Jayanegara,et al.  Meta-analysis on Methane Mitigating Properties of Saponin-rich Sources in the Rumen: Influence of Addition Levels and Plant Sources , 2014, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[20]  Z. Yu,et al.  Effects of quillaja and yucca saponins on communities and select populations of rumen bacteria and archaea, and fermentation in vitro , 2012, Journal of applied microbiology.

[21]  J. Moorby,et al.  Bacterial protein degradation by different rumen protozoal groups. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[22]  M. Song,et al.  Effects of Defaunation on Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Production by Rumen Microbes In vitro When Incubated with Starchy Feed Sources , 2012, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[23]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Effects of Essential Oils on Methane Production and Fermentation by, and Abundance and Diversity of, Rumen Microbial Populations , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  Eric P. Nawrocki,et al.  An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[25]  G. Holtrop,et al.  Study of the effect of presence or absence of protozoa on rumen fermentation and microbial protein contribution to the chyme. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[26]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Populations of Select Cultured and Uncultured Bacteria in the Rumen of Sheep and the Effect of Diets and Ruminal Fractions , 2011, International journal of microbiology.

[27]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[28]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[29]  J. Saxena,et al.  The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production , 2009, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[30]  A. Hristov,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of dietary protein concentration and degradability on milk protein yield and milk N efficiency in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[32]  A. Takenaka,et al.  Real-Time PCR Detection of the Effects of Protozoa on Rumen Bacteria in Cattle , 2006, Current Microbiology.

[33]  T. Michałowski,et al.  Effect of selected rumen fauna on the digestion of starch and outflow of alpha-gllucose polymeres from the reticulo-rumen of sheep , 2005 .

[34]  Jianxin Liu,et al.  Effect of tea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro , 2005 .

[35]  E. Russek-Cohen,et al.  Using blood urea nitrogen to predict nitrogen excretion and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle, sheep, goats, horses, pigs, and rats. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[36]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[37]  M. Kimura,et al.  DGGE method for analyzing 16S rDNA of methanogenic archaeal community in paddy field soil. , 2004, FEMS microbiology letters.

[38]  A. Wright,et al.  Improved strategy for presumptive identification of methanogens using 16S riboprinting. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[39]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  A 1°×1° resolution data set of historical anthropogenic trace gas emissions for the period 1890–1990 , 2001 .

[40]  Yuxi Wang,et al.  In vitro effects of steroidal saponins from Yucca schidigera extract on rumen microbial protein synthesis and ruminal fermentation , 2000 .

[41]  B. A. Dehority Generation times of Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum, determined in vitro by transferring at various time intervals. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[42]  R. Amann,et al.  Intracellular prokaryotes in rumen ciliate protozoa: Detection by confocal laser scanning microscopy after in situ hybridization with fluorescent 16S rRNA probes , 1996 .

[43]  J. Jouany Effect of rumen protozoa on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. , 1996, The Journal of nutrition.

[44]  Y. Tomita,et al.  Electrophoretic Forms of Chitinolytic and Lysozyme Activities in Ruminal Protozoa , 1996, Current Microbiology.

[45]  B. Hull,et al.  Effects of fat saturation and source of fiber on site of nutrient digestion and milk production by lactating dairy cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Emendation of the description of Acidaminococcus fermentans, a trans-aconitate- and citrate-oxidizing bacterium. , 1994, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[47]  R. Stock,et al.  Influence of ruminal protozoa on site and extent of starch digestion and ruminal fermentation. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[48]  W. Kenealy,et al.  Glucose and carbon dioxide metabolism by Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[49]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[50]  A. Bonhomme Rumen ciliates: their metabolism and relationships with bacteria and their hosts , 1990 .

[51]  C. V. Van Nevel,et al.  Effect of defaunation and refaunation of the rumen on rumen fermentation and N-flow in the duodenum of sheep. , 1986, Archiv fur Tierernahrung.

[52]  R. B. Hespell,et al.  Glutamine synthetase activity in the ruminal bacterium Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[53]  R. Wallace,et al.  The Role of Different Species of Bacteria in the Hydrolysis of Protein in the Rumen , 1985 .

[54]  J. Nolan,et al.  Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[55]  L. Krumholz,et al.  Protease activities of rumen protozoa , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[56]  E. Storm,et al.  The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants , 1983, British Journal of Nutrition.

[57]  R. Wallace,et al.  Cellular Location and Some Properties of Proteolytic Enzymes of Rumen Bacteria , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[58]  T. Stanton,et al.  Treponema bryantii sp. nov., a rumen spirochete that interacts with cellulolytic bacteria , 1980, Archives of Microbiology.

[59]  G. Coleman,et al.  The engulfment and digestion of mixed rumen bacteria and individual bacterial species by single and mixed species of rumen ciliate protozoa grown in vivo , 1979, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[60]  Y. Kurihara,et al.  Relationship between bacteria and ciliate protozoa in the rumen of sheep fed on a purified diet , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[61]  R. Clarke,et al.  Bloat in cattle: XXXI. The effect of dimetridazole on the rumen ciliate protozoa of dry and lactating cows , 1969 .

[62]  T. H. Blackburn,et al.  Some observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen proteolytic bacteria. , 1963, Journal of general microbiology.

[63]  A. L. Chaney,et al.  Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. , 1962, Clinical chemistry.

[64]  T. Nagaraja Microbiology of the Rumen , 2016 .

[65]  M. Fondevila,et al.  In vitro predation of pure bacterial species by rumen protozoa from monofaunated sheep, determined by qPCR , 2011 .

[66]  M. Eugène,et al.  Quantitative meta-analysis on the effects of defaunation of the rumen on growth, intake and digestion in ruminants , 2004 .

[67]  Neil Hunter,et al.  Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. , 2002, Microbiology.

[68]  O Hammer-Muntz,et al.  PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis version 2.09 , 2001 .

[69]  D. E. Akin,et al.  Bacteria, Fungi, and Protozoa of the Rumen , 1997 .

[70]  M. Cotta,et al.  Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds , 1997 .

[71]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[72]  M. Mitsumori,et al.  INFLUENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF PROTOZOA ON THE RUMEN MICROBIAL POPULATION OF CATTLE , 1994 .

[73]  G. Coleman,et al.  The Rumen Protozoa , 1992, Brock/Springer Series in Contemporary Bioscience.

[74]  J. Jouany Rumen microbial metabolism and ruminant digestion , 1991 .

[75]  A. Warner,et al.  Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant. , 1975 .

[76]  S. Mann,et al.  Development of the rumen microbial population: high starch diets and instability. , 1970 .