Polarized fluorescence photobleaching recovery for measuring rotational diffusion in solutions and membranes.

A variation of fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) suitable for measuring the rate of rotational molecular diffusion in solution and cell membranes is presented in theory and experimental practice for epi-illumination microscopy. In this technique, a brief flash of polarized laser light creates an anisotropic distribution of unbleached fluorophores which relaxes by rotational diffusion, leading to a time-dependent postbleach fluorescence. Polarized FPR (PFPR) is applicable to any time scales from seconds to microseconds. However, at fast (microsecond) time scales, a partial recovery independent of molecular orientation tends to obscure rotational effects. The theory here presents a method for overcoming this reversible photobleaching, and includes explicit results for practical geometries, fast wobble of fluorophores, and arbitrary bleaching depth. This variation of a polarized luminescence "pump-and-probe" technique is compared with prior ones and with "pump-only" time-resolved luminescence anisotropy decay methods. The technique is experimentally verified on small latex beads with a variety of diameters, common fluorophore labels, and solvent viscosities. Preliminary measurements on a protein (acetylcholine receptor) in the membrane of nondeoxygenated cells in live culture (rat myotubes) show a difference in rotational diffusion between clustered and nonclustered receptors. In most experiments, signal averaging, high laser power, and automated sample translation must be employed to achieve adequate statistical accuracy.

[1]  B. Barisas,et al.  Protein rotational motion in solution measured by polarized fluorescence depletion. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[2]  E. Barnard,et al.  Rotational mobility of the membrane‐bound acetylcholine receptor of torpedo electric organ measured by phosphorescence depolarisation , 1980, FEBS letters.

[3]  W. Webb,et al.  Lateral motion of fluorescently labeled acetylcholine receptors in membranes of developing muscle fibers. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Kinosita,et al.  Dynamic structure of biological and model membranes: analysis by optical anisotropy decay measurement. , 1984, Advances in biophysics.

[5]  R. D. Spencer,et al.  Fluorescence polarization: measurements with a photon-counting photometer. , 1978, The Review of scientific instruments.

[6]  D. A. Dunnett.  Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[7]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[8]  F. Barrantes,et al.  Rotational molecular dynamics of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor revealed by phosphorescence spectroscopy. , 1981, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  D. Axelrod,et al.  Cell surface heating during fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[10]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[11]  W. Wegener.  Fluorescence recovery spectroscopy as a probe of slow rotational motions. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[13]  D. Axelrod.  Carbocyanine dye orientation in red cell membrane studied by microscopic fluorescence polarization. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[14]  R. Dale.  Depolarized fluorescence photobleaching recovery , 1987, European Biophysics Journal.