Tuples, Discontinuity, and Gapping in Categorial Grammar

This paper solves some puzzles in the formalisation of logic for discontinuity in categorial grammar. A 'tuple' operation introduced in [Solias, 1992] is defined as a mode of prosodic combination which has associated projection functions, and consequently can support a property of unique prosodic decomposability. Discontinuity operators are defined model-theoretically by a residuation scheme which is particularly ammenable proof-theoretically. This enables a formulation which both improves on the logic for wrapping and infixing of [Moortgat, 1988] which is only partial, and resolves some problems of determinacy of insertion point in the application of these proposals to in-situ binding phenomena. A discontinuous product is also defined by the residuation scheme, enabling formulation of rules of both use and proof for a 'substring' product that would have been similarly doomed to partial logic.We show how the apparatus enables characterisation of discontinous functors such as particle verbs and phrasal idioms, and binding phenomena such as quantifier raising and pied piping. We conclude by showing how the apparatus enables a simple categorial analysis of (SVO) gapping using the discontinuity product and the wrapping operator.

[1]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Heads and Phrases. Type Calculus for Dependency and Constituent Structure , 1991 .

[2]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English , 1985 .

[3]  Joachim Lambek,et al.  On the Calculus of Syntactic Types , 1961 .

[4]  Richard T. Oehrle,et al.  Boolean Properties in the Analysis of Gapping , 1987 .

[5]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Type Logical Grammar: Categorial Logic of Signs , 1994 .

[6]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Intensionality and boundedness , 1990 .

[7]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures , 1988 .

[8]  Eric Bach,et al.  Discontinuous constituents in generalized categorial grammars , 1981 .

[9]  J. Lambek The Mathematics of Sentence Structure , 1958 .

[10]  Carl Pollard,et al.  Categorial Grammar and Phrase Structure Grammar: An Excursion on the Syntax-Semantics Frontier , 1988 .

[11]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Proof Figures and Structural Operators for Categorial Grammar , 1991, EACL.

[12]  Richard T. Oehrle,et al.  Multi-Dimensional Compositional Functions as a Basis for Grammatical Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects , 1961 .

[14]  J. Lambek,et al.  Categorial and Categorical Grammars , 1988 .

[15]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  Logics in AI , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  David R. Dowty Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction , 1988 .

[17]  Y. Bar-Hillel A Quasi-Arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description , 1953 .

[18]  Glyn Morrill,et al.  Categorial Formalisation of Relativisation: Pied Piping, Islands, and Extraction Sites , 1992 .

[19]  J. Michael Dunn,et al.  Gaggle Theory: An Abstraction of Galois Connections and Residuation with Applications to Negation, Implication, and Various Logical Operations , 1990, JELIA.

[20]  M. Moortgat Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus , 1988 .

[21]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Gapping as constituent coordination , 1990 .

[22]  Glyn MorrillCentre,et al.  Grammar and Logical Types , 1990 .

[23]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  The semantics of variety in categorial grammar , 1988 .

[24]  M. T. S. Arís Gramáticas categoriales, coordinación generalizada y elisión , 1993 .

[25]  Emmon Bach,et al.  Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars , 1984 .