Conceptual Design of Environmentally Friendly Rotorcraft A Comparison of NASA and ONERA Approaches

In 2011, a task was initiated under the US-French Project Agreement on rotorcraft studies to collaborate on design methodologies for environmentally friendly rotorcraft. This paper summarizes the efforts of that collaboration. The French and US aerospace agencies, ONERA and NASA, have their own software toolsets and approaches to rotorcraft design. The first step of this research effort was to understand how rotorcraft impact the environment, with the initial focus on air pollution. Second, similar baseline helicopters were developed for a passenger transport mission, using NASA and ONERA rotorcraft design software tools. Comparisons were made between the designs generated by the two tools. Finally, rotorcraft designs were generated targeting reduced environmental impact. The results show that a rotorcraft design that targets reduced environmental impact can be significantly different than one that targets traditional cost drivers, such as fuel burn and empty weight.

[1]  F. Deidewig,et al.  Methods to Assess Aircraft Engine Emissions in Flight , 1996 .

[2]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Application of Climate Impact Metrics to Civil Tiltrotor Design , 2013 .

[3]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Conceptual Design and Performance Analysis for a Large Civil Compound Helicopter , 2012 .

[4]  C. W. Acree,et al.  Selection of Rotor Solidity for Heavy Lift Tiltrotor Design , 2010 .

[5]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Calculation of Rotor Performance and Loads Under Stalled Conditions , 2003 .

[6]  Wayne Johnson ROTORCRAFT AEROMECHANICS APPLICATIONS OF A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[7]  Wayne R. Johnson,et al.  NDARC NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft , 2013 .

[8]  C. W. Acree,et al.  Performance Optimization of the NASA Large Civil Tiltrotor , 2008 .

[9]  C. W. Acree,et al.  Influence of Alternative Engine Concepts on LCTR2 Sizing and Mission Profile , 2012 .

[10]  R. A. Ormiston,et al.  Comparison and validation of the France/USA finite state rotor dynamic inflow models , 2010 .

[11]  Keith P. Shine,et al.  Impact of perturbations to nitrogen oxide emissions from global aviation , 2008 .

[12]  Gloria K. Yamauchi,et al.  NASA Heavy Lift Rotorcraft Systems Investigation , 2013 .

[13]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Performance Analysis of a Utility Helicopter with Standard and Advanced Rotors , 2004 .

[14]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Exploration of Configuration Options for a Large Civil Compound Helicopter , 2013 .

[15]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Rotorcraft Aerodynamics Models for a Comprehensive Analysis , 1998 .

[16]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Prediction of Rotor Structural Loads with Comprehensive Analysis , 2008 .

[17]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century , 2009, Atmospheric Environment.

[18]  C. W. Acree,et al.  Integration of Rotor Aerodynamic Optimization with the Conceptual Design of a Large Civil Tiltrotor , 2010 .

[19]  Berend G. van der Wall,et al.  AERODYNAMIC AND AERO-ACOUSTIC OPTIMIZATION OF MODERN TILT-ROTOR BLADES WITHIN THE ADYN PROJECT , 2004 .

[20]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Calculation of Tilt Rotor Aeroacoustic Model (TRAM DNW) Performance, Airloads, and Structural Loads , 2000 .

[21]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Assessment of Comprehensive Analysis Calculation of Airloads on Helicopter Rotors , 2005 .

[22]  Onera,et al.  Modeling Of The Dynamic Inflow On The Main Rotor And The Tail Components In Helicopter Flight Mechanics , 1997 .

[23]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: an update on IPCC (1999) , 2005 .

[24]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices , 2003 .

[25]  Franklin D. Harris,et al.  Rotor Performance at High Advance Ratio: Theory versus Test , 2008 .

[26]  B. Metz The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2011 .

[27]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Metric for Comparing Lifetime average Climate Impact of Aircraft , 2011 .

[28]  Wayne Johnson NDARC-NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft Theoretical Basis and Architecture , 2010 .

[29]  S. Burguburu,et al.  A . T . I . O . N . project for rotorcraft concepts evaluation : The first steps , 2012 .

[30]  Vassilios Pachidis,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach for the Comprehensive Assessment of Integrated Rotorcraft–Powerplant Systems at Mission Level , 2014 .

[31]  J. Prasad,et al.  Prediction of Vortex Ring State Boundary of a Helicopter in Descending Flight by Simulation , 2008 .

[32]  P.-M. Basset,et al.  A fenestron model for improving the helicopter yaw dynamics flight simulation , 2004 .

[33]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Technology Drivers in the Development of CAMRAD II , 1999 .

[34]  M. Hamers,et al.  Finite State Rotor Induced Flow Model For Interferences and Ground Effect , 2001 .

[35]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  NDARC - NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft Validation and Demonstration , 2010 .

[36]  D. Petot,et al.  The CREATION project for rotorcraft concepts evaluation: The first steps , 2011 .

[37]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  HOST, a General Helicopter Simulation Tool for Germany and France , 2000 .