Precompensated excitation waveforms to suppress harmonic generation in MEMS electrostatic transducers

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) electrostatic-based transducers inherently produce harmonics as the electrostatic force generated in the transmit mode is approximately proportional to the square of the applied voltage signal. This characteristic precludes them from being effectively used for harmonic imaging (either with or without the addition of microbubble-based contrast agents). The harmonic signal that is nonlinearly generated by tissue (or contrast agent) cannot be distinguished from the inherent transmitted harmonic signal. We investigated two precompensation methods to cancel this inherent harmonic generation in electrostatic transducers. A combination of finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental results are presented. The first approach relies on a calculation, or measurement, of the transducer's linear transfer function, which is valid for small signal levels. Using this transfer function and a measurement of the undesired harmonic signal, a predistorted transmit signal was calculated to cancel the harmonic inherently generated by the transducer. Due to the lack of perfect linearity, the approach does not work completely in a single iteration. However, with subsequent iterations, the problem becomes more linear and converges toward a very satisfactory result (a 18.6 dB harmonic reduction was achieved in FEA simulations and a 20.7 dB reduction was measured in a prototype experiment). The second approach tested involves defining a desired function [including a direct current (DC) offset], then taking the square root of this function to determine the shape of the required input function. A 5.5 dB reduction of transmitted harmonic was obtained in both FEA simulation and experimental prototypes test.

[1]  D. Mills,et al.  Real-time in-vivo imaging with capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (cMUT) linear arrays , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[2]  Abdullah Atalar,et al.  Silicon micromachined ultrasonic immersion transducers , 1996 .

[3]  A. Ergun,et al.  Dynamic analysis of CMUTs in different regimes of operation , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[4]  John C. Lazenby,et al.  Ultrasound imaging system employing phase inversion subtraction to enhance the image , 1998 .

[5]  Butrus T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic immersion transducers , 1999 .

[6]  John Mould,et al.  Silicon substrate ringing in microfabricated ultrasonic transducers , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[7]  I. Ladabaum,et al.  Theory and analysis of electrode size optimization for capacitive microfabricated ultrasonic transducers , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  David A. Hutchins,et al.  Field characterization of an air-coupled micromachined ultrasonic capacitance transducer , 1997 .

[9]  B.T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Finite element analysis of underwater capacitor micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  O. Oralkan,et al.  Volumetric imaging using 2D capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer arrays (CMUTs): initial results , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[11]  D. Schindel,et al.  Applications of micromachined capacitance transducers in air-coupled ultrasonics and nondestructive evaluation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  I. Ladabaum,et al.  The microfabrication of capacitive ultrasonic transducers , 1997, Proceedings of International Solid State Sensors and Actuators Conference (Transducers '97).

[15]  Fahrettin Levent Degertekin,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for forward looking intravascular imaging arrays , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[16]  O. Oralkan,et al.  Simulation and experimental characterization of a 2-D capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer array element , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  T. Christopher Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  I. Ladabaum,et al.  Micromachined ultrasonic transducers (MUTs) , 1995, 1995 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium.

[20]  L. Weinert,et al.  The role of echocardiographic harmonic imaging and contrast enhancement for improvement of endocardial border delineation. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Characterization of one-dimensional capacitive micromachined ultrasonic immersion transducer arrays , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  B.T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  John Mould,et al.  Time-domain models of MUT array cross-talk in silicon substrates , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).