Acknowledging temporal diversity in sustainability transformations at the nexus of interconnected systems

The language of the global sustainability discourse in science and society is laden with time rhetoric, and time has been identified as one major contextual condition for sustainability transformations. Still, time and temporal dynamics are often not explicitly considered or conceptualized in research and strategy-building towards sustainability transformations in social-ecological and socio-technical systems: While existing approaches to time such as the concept of time ecology mainly inform system knowledge, many transformation concepts are found to lack an in-depth integration of time. This sets up the challenge to acknowledge and operationalize temporal system dynamics in transformation processes, in order to be able to plan and act purposefully towards long-term sustainable development. In this article, we take a first step to meet this challenge and propose an approach towards operationalizing and integrating the findings of time ecology for these sustainability transformation concepts. The presented time-in-transformations-approach consists of three subsequent steps. Each step informs specific features of the transformation process and is operationalized on the basis of insights from time ecology. By applying these steps to the exemplary case of the mineral-energy nexus, we show how our approach might enable a better temporal system understanding and support a structured reflection on human perception of change and typical temporal patterns. The approach leads to two main outcomes: First, it can inform how to design and carry out interventions in a way that they consider a system’s temporal resilience and transformability. Second, an active consideration of temporal dynamics can inform strategy-building towards coherent sustainability transformations across sectors and regulatory levels, spatial and temporal scales. Therefore, it can contribute to a shared and operational understanding of temporal diversity and may thus meaningfully complement existing approaches to analyze, assess and purposefully intervene into systems across sector boundaries.

[1]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .

[2]  J. Hukkinen,et al.  Addressing the temporal fit of institutions: the regulation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in Europe , 2014 .

[3]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits , 2011 .

[4]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  On the Future Availability of the Energy Metals , 2011 .

[5]  A. Nordmann Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation , 2014 .

[6]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[7]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis , 2011, AMBIO.

[8]  P. Olsson,et al.  Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective , 2014 .

[9]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Functions of scenarios in transition processes , 2006 .

[10]  K. Kümmerer Konzentration, Funktionalität und Dissipation – Grundkategorien zum Verständnis der Verfügbarkeit metallischer Rohstoffe , 2016 .

[11]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards , 2000 .

[12]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science , 2013 .

[13]  Till Zimmermann,et al.  Material Flows Resulting from Large Scale Deployment of Wind Energy in Germany , 2013 .

[14]  John E. Tilton,et al.  On Borrowed Time: Assessing the Threat of Mineral Depletion , 2002 .

[15]  Victor Steinberg,et al.  Orientation and dynamics of a vesicle in tank-treading motion in shear flow. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[16]  Daniel J. Lang,et al.  Many pathways toward sustainability: not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[17]  Christine Boomsma,et al.  Perceptions of time in relation to climate change , 2014 .

[18]  F. Geels Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[19]  B. McLellan,et al.  Responsible mineral and energy futures: views at the nexus , 2014 .

[20]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[21]  N. T. Nassar,et al.  Criticality of metals and metalloids , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Zeit, Wohlstand und Gutes Leben: Was kann Zeitpolitik zur Großen Transformation beitragen? (Time, Prosperity and the Good Life: How Time Policies Can Contribute to the Great Transformation) , 2015 .

[23]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Global Governance for Sustainable Resource Management , 2008 .

[24]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability , 2010 .

[25]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[26]  M. Held,et al.  Die Bedeutung der Zeit , 1997 .

[27]  Klaus Kümmerer,et al.  The Ecological Impact of Time , 1996 .

[28]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social Studies of Science.

[29]  Klaus Kümmerer,et al.  Sustainable use of soils and time , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[30]  M. Held,et al.  Sustainable Development from a Temporal Perspective , 2001 .

[31]  Tzimas Evangelos,et al.  Critical Metals in Strategic Energy Technologies - Assessing Rare Metals as Supply-Chain Bottlenecks in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies , 2011 .

[32]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[33]  Carl Folke,et al.  Social-ecological memory in urban gardens-Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[34]  T. Prior,et al.  Resourcing the future: Using foresight in resource governance , 2013 .

[35]  F. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective , 2010 .

[36]  M. Held,et al.  Die stofflichen Voraussetzungen der Energiewende in der Großen Transformation , 2016 .

[37]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Role of cell cycle on the cellular uptake and dilution of nanoparticles in a cell population. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[38]  Klaus Kümmerer,et al.  Sustainability, substance flow management and time. Part I Temporal analysis of substance flows. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  W. Steffen,et al.  The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration , 2015 .

[40]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[41]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[42]  G. Corder,et al.  Critical Minerals and Energy–Impacts and Limitations of Moving to Unconventional Resources , 2016 .

[43]  M. Held,et al.  Rhythmen und Resilienz- Nachhaltige Entwicklung in zeitlicher Perspektive , 2004 .

[44]  A. Giddens The Politics of Climate Change , 2009 .

[45]  C. Folke,et al.  Social-Ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: the Development of Adaptive Co-management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden , 2004 .

[46]  D. Lang,et al.  Putting sustainable chemistry and resource use into context: The role of temporal diversity , 2017 .

[47]  J. Butlin,et al.  Our common future. By World commission on environment and development. (London, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp.383 £5.95.) , 1989 .

[48]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[49]  D. Lang,et al.  Leverage points for sustainability transformation , 2017, Ambio.

[50]  R. Slade,et al.  Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass , 2015 .

[51]  C. Clancy The politics of temporality: Autonomy, temporal spaces and resoluteness , 2014 .

[52]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[53]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Time for the Environment: The Tutzing Time Ecology Project , 1997 .

[54]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  How much time do we have? Urgency and rhetoric in sustainability science , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[55]  K. Kümmerer,et al.  Sustainability, substance-flow management, and time, Part II: Temporal impact assessment (TIA) for substance-flow management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  D. Reider,et al.  Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System , 2012 .

[57]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[58]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Metal recycling: opportunities, limits, infrastructure , 2012 .

[59]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[60]  Shigemi Kagawa,et al.  Global mining risk footprint of critical metals necessary for low-carbon technologies: the case of neodymium, cobalt, and platinum in Japan. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.