What do older people understand by mobility-related difficulties?

UNLABELLED Despite the centrality of the difficulty concept in the study of disability, there has been little research on its significance from the point of view of people with functional limitations. The main objective of this study was to describe what older people understand when asked about difficulty in undertaking mobility activities. As a secondary objective, we considered whether there are any differences depending on the type of activities, according to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) mobility domains. METHODS Seventeen community-dwelling men and women aged 70 years old or over were interviewed by means of a questionnaire containing 55 items covering the ICF mobility domains. The participants responded to the items while thinking aloud, saying what led them to give a specific answer about their level of difficulty. Inductive content analysis was conducted and categories, subthemes and themes were identified. RESULTS Causes of difficulty (pathologies, impairments, symptoms) and accommodations (task modifications and use of aids) were the two themes identified; and their importance (and that of the subthemes included) varied across the types of activity. All the participants said that they had no difficulty in at least one task, despite mentioning changes in the way they performed them. CONCLUSIONS Older people's opinions were consistent with theoretical models of disability and with the standard practice of measuring functional limitations by asking about the degree of difficulty; however, the design of these measures needs to be improved in order to detect perceptions of no difficulty in the presence of task modification.

[1]  Cynthia J Brown,et al.  Mobility limitation in the older patient: a clinical review. , 2013, JAMA.

[2]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[3]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  S. J. Sinclair,et al.  Activity Outcome Measurement for Postacute Care , 2004, Medical care.

[5]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Toward a common language of disablement. , 2009, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[6]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Severity of upper and lower extremity functional limitation: scale development and validation with self-report and performance-based measures of physical function. WHAS Research Group. Women's Health and Aging Study. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  Further evidence for the importance of subclinical functional limitation and subclinical disability assessment in gerontology and geriatrics. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  L. Fried,et al.  Disability in Older Adults: Evidence Regarding Significance, Etiology, and Risk , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  M. Cabañero‐Martínez,et al.  Validation of a mobility item bank for older patients in primary care , 2012, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[10]  Kathleen A. Turano,et al.  Preclinical Disability , 1991 .

[11]  L. Verbrugge,et al.  Views of Disability in the United States and Singapore , 2006 .

[12]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[13]  N. Krupp Adaptation to chronic illness. , 1976, Postgraduate medicine.

[14]  L. Fried,et al.  Why Do Older Adults Decide They Are Having Difficulty with a Task? , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  The pathway from musculoskeletal pain to mobility difficulty in older disabled women , 2007, Pain.

[16]  A M Jette,et al.  The disablement process. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[17]  A. Jette,et al.  Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument , 2015 .

[18]  E. Porter Scales and tales: older women's difficulty with daily tasks. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[19]  Jennifer C Cornman,et al.  Demographic and socioeconomic status differences in perceptions of difficulty with mobility in late life. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[20]  J. Johnson,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of gross self-neglect amongst older people living in the community. , 1998, Journal of clinical nursing.

[21]  E. Pfeiffer A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  R. Lorenz Coping with preclinical disability: older women's experiences of everyday activities. , 2010, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[23]  C. McHorney,et al.  Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  J. Guralnik,et al.  Lower Extremity Physical Performance and Use of Compensatory Strategies for Mobility , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  Ageing, Disability and the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003 .

[26]  J D Williamson,et al.  Functional decline in older adults: expanding methods of ascertainment. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[28]  E. Badley,et al.  Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[29]  Vicki A Freedman,et al.  Adopting the ICF language for studying late-life disability: a field of dreams? , 2009, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[30]  M Rose,et al.  Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Self-reported preclinical disability identifies older women with early declines in performance and early disease. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  David Melzer,et al.  Variation in thresholds for reporting mobility disability between national population subgroups and studies. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[33]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[34]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.