Environmental Monitoring: Inferring the Diatom Index from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Diatoms are widely used as bioindicators for the assessment of water quality in rivers and streams. Classically, the diatom biotic indices are based on the relative abundance of morphologically identified species weighted by their autoecological value. Obtaining such indices is time-consuming, costly, and requires excellent taxonomic expertise, which is not always available. Here we tested the possibility to overcome these limitations using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach to identify and quantify diatoms found in environmental DNA and RNA samples. We analyzed 27 river sites in the Geneva area (Switzerland), in order to compare the values of the Swiss Diatom Index (DI-CH) computed either by microscopic quantification of diatom species or directly from NGS data. Despite gaps in the reference database and variations in relative abundance of analyzed species, the diatom index shows a significant correlation between morphological and molecular data indicating similar biological quality status for the majority of sites. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential of the NGS approach for identification and quantification of diatoms in environmental samples, opening new avenues toward the routine application of genetic tools for bioassessment and biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems.

[1]  Gernot Glöckner,et al.  Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[2]  Philippe Esling,et al.  Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Philippe Esling,et al.  Environmental monitoring through protist next‐generation sequencing metabarcoding: assessing the impact of fish farming on benthic foraminifera communities , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[4]  F. Lejzerowicz,et al.  Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future , 2014, The Biological Bulletin.

[5]  Regine Jahn,et al.  Taxonomic Reference Libraries for Environmental Barcoding: A Best Practice Example from Diatom Research , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  F. Altermatt,et al.  Transport Distance of Invertebrate Environmental DNA in a Natural River , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Alain Franc,et al.  A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to River Biomonitoring Using Benthic Diatoms , 2014, Freshwater Science.

[9]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[10]  Thorsten Stoeck,et al.  A morphogenetic survey on ciliate plankton from a mountain lake pinpoints the necessity of lineage-specific barcode markers in microbial ecology , 2013, Environmental microbiology.

[11]  F. Rimet,et al.  Next‐generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[12]  J. Pawlowski,et al.  Can Abundance of Protists Be Inferred from Sequence Data: A Case Study of Foraminifera , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol , 2012, BMC Ecology.

[14]  P. Altevogt,et al.  Vesiclepedia: A Compendium for Extracellular Vesicles with Continuous Community Annotation , 2012, PLoS biology.

[15]  J. Spouge,et al.  CBOL Protist Working Group: Barcoding Eukaryotic Richness beyond the Animal, Plant, and Fungal Kingdoms , 2012, PLoS biology.

[16]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Distance and Character-Based Evaluation of the V4 Region of the 18S rRNA Gene for the Identification of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  K. Eric Wommack,et al.  Groundtruthing Next-Gen Sequencing for Microbial Ecology–Biases and Errors in Community Structure Estimates from PCR Amplicon Pyrosequencing , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  RAxML-Light: a tool for computing terabyte phylogenies , 2012, Bioinform..

[19]  F. Rimet,et al.  Biomonitoring river diatoms: Implications of taxonomic resolution , 2012 .

[20]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next‐generation DNA sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[21]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[22]  Christian Gieger,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Common Variants Associated with Brachial Circumference: A Meta-Analysis of 14 Cohorts , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  F. Rimet.  Recent views on river pollution and diatoms , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[24]  I. Kaczmarska,et al.  Survey of the Efficacy of a Short Fragment of the rbcL Gene as a Supplemental DNA Barcode for Diatoms , 2011, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[25]  Regine Jahn,et al.  Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols , 2011, Organisms Diversity & Evolution.

[26]  D. Mann,et al.  Barcoding diatoms: exploring alternatives to COI-5P. , 2011, Protist.

[27]  D. Baird,et al.  Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  I. Kaczmarska,et al.  A protocol for a single-cell PCR of diatoms from fixed samples: method validation using Ditylum brightwellii (T. West) Grunow , 2011 .

[29]  T. Bruns,et al.  Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[30]  F. Jönsson,et al.  RNA-dependent control of gene amplification , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  B. Ottenwälder,et al.  Contrasting seasonal niche separation between rare and abundant taxa conceals the extent of protist diversity , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[32]  B. Ottenwälder,et al.  Diversity in a hidden world: potential and limitation of next‐generation sequencing for surveys of molecular diversity of eukaryotic microorganisms , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[33]  O. Gascuel,et al.  SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  I. Kaczmarska,et al.  Barcoding diatoms: Is there a good marker? , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[35]  M. Kelly,et al.  A comparison of national approaches to setting ecological status boundaries in phytobenthos assessment for the European Water Framework Directive: results of an intercalibration exercise , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[36]  David G. Mann,et al.  A proposed protocol for nomenclaturally effective DNA barcoding of microalgae , 2009 .

[37]  Maria E. Asplund,et al.  Quantification of Diatom and Dinoflagellate Biomasses in Coastal Marine Seawater Samples by Real-Time PCR , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  D. Mann,et al.  An assessment of potential diatom "barcode" genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). , 2007, Protist.

[39]  M. Dokulil,et al.  Littoral diatom assemblages as bioindicators of lake trophic status: A case study from perialpine lakes in Austria , 2004 .

[40]  T. Gregory,et al.  The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. , 2003, Genome.

[41]  Jennifer G. Winter,et al.  Use of Diatoms and Macroinvertebrates as Bioindicators of Water Quality in Southern Ontario Rivers , 2002 .

[42]  D. DeNicola.  A review of diatoms found in highly acidic environments , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[43]  David G. Mann,et al.  Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms , 1996 .

[44]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms , 2010 .

[45]  I. Kaczmarska,et al.  Barcoding of diatoms: nuclear encoded ITS revisited. , 2010, Protist.

[46]  D. Mann,et al.  DNA barcoding for species identification and discovery in diatoms , 2010 .