A rapid inversion technique for transient electromagnetic soundings

Abstract Interpreting electromagnetic (EM) data is difficult because responses of three-dimensional (3-D) models of the Earth are complicated and expensive to calculate. To simplify interpretation we developed an approximate method based on the behavior of transient currents in a layered-Earth model to estimate the variation of resistivity with depth beneath a controlled-source EM survey. Responses measured in the vicinity of each source are approximately matched at each delay time by the magnetic field of a current filament in free space. This filament, which moves downward with time, is an image of the loop or grounded-wire transmitter used in the survey. A continuous resistivity profile with depth is estimated from the velocity of the filament. Our inverse solution is simple and rapid, and provides meaningful interpretations even when the measured responses are contaminated by random or geological noise. Although overshoots in the estimated resistivity profile and a spatial smearing of the zones of anomalous conductivity can occur, our technique seems to be less biased by 3-D effects than is computer-intensive, layered-Earth model fitting using constrained nonlinear optimization. This is because we do not artificially parameterize the Earth into a finite number of layers. In a direct comparison using the two techniques to interpret a set of field data from a geothermal site, we find that certain features of the interpreted models are similar, and thus probably essential, while others are not. Given the inherent ambiguities and ubiquitous bias in EM inversion, the smoothed resistivity profile produced by the approximate scheme often is adequate.

[1]  K. Strack,et al.  The deep transient electromagnetic sounding technique: First field test in Australia , 1984 .

[2]  C. Barnett Simple inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data , 1984 .

[3]  Art Raiche,et al.  Apparent resistivity and diffusion velocity , 1985 .

[4]  James Macnae,et al.  Imaging quasi-layered conductive structures by simple processing of transient electromagnetic data , 1987 .

[5]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Interpretation of transient electromagnetic soundings over three-dimensional structures for the central-loop configuration , 1987 .

[6]  M. Nabighian Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space; an approximate representation , 1979 .

[7]  Brian R. Spies,et al.  The use and misuse of apparent resistivity in electromagnetic methods , 1986 .

[8]  A. G. Nekut,et al.  Direct inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data , 1987 .

[9]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth , 1986 .

[10]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  An evaluation of electromagnetic methods in the presence of geologic noise , 1987 .

[11]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[12]  G. Hoversten,et al.  Transient fields of a current loop source above a layered earth , 1982 .

[13]  G. Temple Static and Dynamic Electricity , 1940, Nature.

[14]  Gerald W. Hohmann,et al.  Integral equation solution for the transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a conductive half-space , 1985 .

[15]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three‐dimensional transient electromagnetic responses for a grounded source , 1986 .

[16]  James Macnae,et al.  A time‐domain EM system measuring the step response of the ground , 1984 .

[17]  G. Keller,et al.  Frequency and transient soundings , 1983 .

[18]  Art Raiche,et al.  Comparison of apparent resistivity functions for transient electromagnetic methods , 1983 .