SEMANTIC AND GEOMETRIC INTEGRATION OF GEOSCIENTIFIC DATA SETS WITH ATKIS – APPLIED TO GEO-OBJECTS FROM GEOLOGY AND SOIL SCIENCE

Solving problems in an environmental or geoscientific domain usually involves various data from different sources: Typically, not all the data is available in one dataset, but is distributed, has different formats, and different thematic focus. Data integration is therefore needed for the combination and analysis of different data sets. The project “Geotechnologien – New methods for semantic and geometric integration of geoscientific data sets with ATKIS – applied to geo-objects from geology and soil science” funded by the German Ministry of Research investigates different aspects of data integration and aims at developing methods for automatic integration from different data-sets and their consistent management in a federated data base. Three different vector data sets are used in the project: the topographic data set ATKIS, the geological map and the soil science map. The topographic component of the geological and the soil science map is based on topographic maps, but the frequency of update differs between ATKIS and the geoscience maps. Thus, the data sets differ not only in thematic content, but also referring to seemingly identical topographic objects. In the first step of the project the objects and their semantics in the different data sets are investigated in detail, the object water will be the first very promising candidate for identifying the conformity between the different data sets. In the second step, a geometric reconciliation will be established. To this end, firstly corresponding objects will be identified using matching procedures. The identified objects from the geoscientific maps will be adapted to the reference objects from ATKIS. Following this procedure the automatic change detection shows all the differences between the reference data set and the data sets to be integrated.

[1]  Volker Walter,et al.  Zuordnung von raumbezogenen Daten: am Beispiel der Datenmodelle ATKIS und GDF , 1997 .

[2]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  Map integration—update propagation in a multi-source environment , 1997, GIS '97.

[3]  A. Dam OBJECT RECOGNITION AND SCENE CLASSIFICATION FROM MULTISPECTRAL AND MULTISENSOR PIXELS , 1999 .

[4]  T. Badard On the automatic retrieval of updates in geographic databases based on geographic data matching tools , 1999 .

[5]  Gunter Saake,et al.  Adding Conflict Resolution Features to a Query Language for Database Federations , 2000, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Carsten Kleiner,et al.  Web-Enabling Geographic Data with Object-Relational Databases , 2001, BTW.

[7]  C. Heipke,et al.  MODELLING THE INTEGRATION OF HETEROGENEOUS VECTOR DATA AND AERIAL IMAGERY , 2003 .

[8]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  SchemaSQL - A Language for Interoperability in Relational Multi-Database Systems , 1996, VLDB.

[9]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Robert Laurini Spatial Multi-Database Topological Continuity and Indexing: A Step Towards Seamless GIS Data Interoperability , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Volker Walter,et al.  Matching spatial data sets: a statistical approach , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Carsten Kleiner,et al.  Automatic Generation of XML DTDs from Conceptual Database Schemas , 2001, GI Jahrestagung.

[13]  Claus Brenner TOWARDS FULLY AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF CITY MODELS , 2000 .

[14]  Carsten Kleiner,et al.  Efficient index structures for spatio-temporal objects , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.