Power System Quality Improvement Using Flexible AC Transmission Systems Based on Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System

This paper introduces comprehensive fast control characteristics and continuous compensation means using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices have been investigated and adopted in power engineering area. There are so many advantages in using FACTS devices. It can increase dynamic stability, loading capability of transmission lines, improve power quality as well as system security. It can also increase utilization of lowest cost generation. This paper presents a detailed Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System based algorithm for improving power system quality using Advanced Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) controllers. Namely, Advanced Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors (ATCSCs), and Advanced Static Var Compensator (ASVC) were utilized in this research. This paper focuses on the operation of the FACTS device under generator fault that may cause any other transmission lines to be overflowed. Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used to determine the value of capacitor connected to the FACTS. The proposed algorithm in this paper is tested on the IEEE 30 bus system as well as IEEE 14 bus system.

[1]  Chih-Wen Liu,et al.  New methods for computing a saddle-node bifurcation point for voltage stability analysis , 1995 .

[2]  Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.  SVC placement using critical modes of voltage instability , 1993 .

[3]  Hari Om Bansal,et al.  Optimal Location of FACT Devices to Control Reactive Power , 2010 .

[4]  Danny Sutanto,et al.  Application of an optimisation method for determining the reactive margin from voltage collapse in reactive power planning , 1996 .

[5]  Hadi Saadat,et al.  Power Systems Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Mohd Wazir Mustafa,et al.  OPTIMAL LOCATION OF TCSC DEVICE FOR DAMPING OSCILLATIONS , 2009 .

[7]  A. Hassan,et al.  IMPROVING POWER SYSTEM QUALITY USING FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS* EIJEST , 2011 .

[8]  P. Rekvava,et al.  Global Journal of Researches in Engineering , 2010 .

[9]  G. Panda,et al.  Fault Classification and Section Identification of an Advanced Series-Compensated Transmission Line Using Support Vector Machine , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  Hari konidala,et al.  Optimal Placement of Shunt Connected FactsDevice in a Series Compensated LongTransmission Line , 2014 .

[11]  Rachid Cherkaoui,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices to enhance power system security , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[12]  C. Cañizares.  Calculating optimal system parameters to maximize the distance to saddle-node bifurcations , 1998 .

[13]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Dynamic compensation of AC transmission lines by solid-state synchronous voltage sources , 1994 .

[14]  Seyed Abbas Taher,et al.  Transmission Congestion Management by Determining Optimal Location of FACTS Devices in Deregulated Power Systems , 2008 .

[15]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices , 1998 .

[16]  Seema Singh,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management , 2001 .

[17]  T. Cutsem.  A method to compute reactive power margins with respect to v , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[18]  Daozhuo Jiang,et al.  Optimal Placement of Shunt Connected Facts Device in a Series Compensated Long Transmission Line , 2009 .

[19]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Optimal Location of UPFC and Comparative Analysis of Maximum Loadability with FACTS in Competitive Electricity Markets , 2007 .

[20]  H. Akagi.  Determination of Needed FACTS Controllers That Increase Asset Utilization of Power Systems , 1997, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[21]  Yog Raj Sood,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices in power system using Genetic Algorithm , 2009, 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC).