Smart, smarter, smartest: foraging information states and coexistence

Animals possess different abilities to gain and use information about the foraging patches they exploit. When ignorant of the qualities of encountered patches, a smart forager Should leave all patches after the same amount of fixed search time. A smarter forager can be Bayesian by using information Oil Cumulative harvest and time spent searching a patch to better inform its patch-departure decision. The smartest forager has immediate and continuous knowledge about patch quality, and can make a perfect decision about when to leave each patch. Here we let each of these three strategies harvest resources from a slowly regenerating environment. Eventually a steady-state distribution of prey among patches arises where the environment-wide resource renewal just balances the environment-wide harvest of the foragers. The fixed time forager creates a distribution with the highest mean and highest variance of patch qualities, Followed by the Bayesian and the prescient in chat order. The less informed strategies promote distributions with both more resources and more exploitable information than the more informed strategies. While it is true chat a better-informed strategy will always out-perform a less well-informed, its Increase in performance may not compensate it for any costs associated with being better informed. We imagine that the fixed time strategy may be least expensive and the prescient strategy most expensive in terms of sensory organs and associated assess and respond capabilities. To consider competition between Such strategies with varying costs, we introduced a single individual of each of the strategies into the environments created by populations of the other strategies. There are threshold costs associated with the better-informed strategy such chat it can or cannot outcompete a less-informed strategy. However, over a relatively narrow range of foraging costs, less-informed and better-informed strategies will coexist. Furthermore, for the prescient and the Bayesian strategies, sonic combinations of foraging costs produce alternate stable states - whichever strategy establishes first remains safe from invasion by the other. (Less)

[1]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Stochastic Models of Optimal Foraging , 1987 .

[2]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Bayesian foraging with only two patch types , 2006 .

[3]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Stopping Rules for Optimal Foragers , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The fitness value of information , 2005, Oikos.

[6]  R. McGehee,et al.  Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  O. Olsson,et al.  Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance , 2006 .

[9]  Bart A. Nolet,et al.  Foraging costs and accessibility as determinants of giving-up densities in a swan-pondweed system , 2006 .

[10]  Elizabeth A. Sandlin,et al.  Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species , 2000 .

[11]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. II. A field test with woodpeckers , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Measuring Patch Assessment Abilities of Desert Granivores , 1989 .

[13]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Gain curves in depletable food patches: A test of five models with European starlings , 2001 .

[14]  Roy E. Plotnick,et al.  CHEMORECEPTION, ODOR LANDSCAPES, AND FORAGING IN ANCIENT MARINE LANDSCAPES , 2007 .

[15]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[16]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour , 2006 .

[17]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging , 1980 .

[18]  J. McNamara.  Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment , 1982 .

[19]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Desert rodent community structure : a test of four mechanisms of coexistence , 1989 .

[20]  Craig W. Osenberg,et al.  COMPLEMENTARY FORAGING BEHAVIORS ALLOW COEXISTENCE OF TWO CONSUMERS , 1999 .

[21]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Incompletely Informed Shorebirds That Face a Digestive Constraint Maximize Net Energy Gain When Exploiting Patches , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments , 1986 .

[23]  M. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  Density-Dependent Patch Exploitation and Acquisition of Environmental Information , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[24]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Downy Woodpecker Foraging Behavior: Efficient Sampling in Simple Stochastic Environments , 1984 .

[25]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Seeds redistribution in sand dunes: a basis for coexistence of two rodent species , 2004 .

[26]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Yukihiko Toquenaga,et al.  Contrasting responses of bumble bees to feeding conspecifics on their familiar and unfamiliar flowers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Richard F. Green.  A simpler, more general method of finding the optimal foraging strategy for Bayesian birds , 2006 .

[30]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[32]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news , 1998 .

[33]  A. Oaten,et al.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[34]  B. Grossi,et al.  On the value of information: studying changes in patch assessment abilities through learning , 2006 .

[35]  Jan A. van Gils,et al.  State-dependent Bayesian foraging on spatially autocorrelated food distributions , 2010 .