Findings of Personalized Ventilation Studies in a Hot and Humid Climate

The concept of personalized ventilation (PV) is at the cutting edge of technological development in the area of air conditioning and is fundamentally aimed at improving ventilation in the immediate breathing zones of occupants in the built environment. While the current state-of-the-art PV systems make this possible for seated individuals within the occupied zone, it is envisaged that flexible PV systems, extending the range of application within the dynamic movements of individuals in an air-conditioned zone, may be a reality in the near future. The ability of PV systems to enhance thermal comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ) and the energy savings that would result were examined under the hot and humid tropical conditions of Singapore. The experimental design consisted of 17 different environmental conditions, characterized by a combination of room ambient temperature (23°C and 26°C), PV air temperature (20°C, 23°C, and 26°C), and the PV airflow rate (7, 11, and 15 L/s per person). The experimental design also included a reference condition with the primary background air-conditioning system operating under the same conditions but without PV air. Eleven human subjects took part in all the experiments, and a detailed questionnaire was employed to solicit their subjective responses during each exposure. Air velocity, air temperature, and ventilation effectiveness were measured in the immediate breathing zone of each occupant. The results indicate that the use of a secondary PV system in conjunction with a primary air-conditioning system not only enhances thermal comfort and IAQ acceptability but can reduce energy consumption by 15–30%. PV systems can improve ventilation effectiveness at the immediate breathing zone by up to 50% more than can be obtained with mixing ventilation (MV) alone, and PV tends to lower the average temperature of inhaled air in the breathing zone by 2–5°C, enhancing perceived air quality. PV temperature and PV flow rate were found to be more critical than ambient temperature for occupants' thermal comfort and the perceived air quality of inhaled air.

[1]  Kwok Wai Tham,et al.  Conserving energy without sacrificing thermal comfort , 1993 .

[2]  S. C. Sekhar,et al.  Higher space temperatures and better thermal comfort — a tropical analysis , 1995 .

[3]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on the Perception of Indoor Air Quality , 1998 .

[4]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  Perceived air quality and thermal sensation with personalised ventilation system , 2002 .

[5]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Localized comfort control with a desktop task conditioning system: laboratory and field measurements , 1993 .

[6]  Taylor Francis Online.  HVAC & R research , 1995 .

[7]  A. Melikov,et al.  Personalized ventilation: evaluation of different air terminal devices , 2002 .

[8]  W. Fisk,et al.  Ventilation efficiencies of desk-mounted task/ambient conditioning systems. , 1999, Indoor air.

[9]  D Faulkner,et al.  Ventilation efficiencies and thermal comfort results of a desk-edge-mounted task ventilation system. , 2004, Indoor air.

[10]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  Performance of personalized ventilation in a room with an underfloor air distribution system: transport of contaminants between occupants , 2003 .

[11]  P. Fanger,et al.  ADAPTATION TO INDOOR AIR POLLUTION , 1992 .

[12]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings , 1998 .

[13]  P. Fanger,et al.  Human response to personalized ventilation and mixing ventilation. , 2004, Indoor air.

[14]  A. Melikov,et al.  Impact of airflow interaction on inhaled air quality and transport of contaminants in rooms with personalized and total volume ventilation , 2003 .

[15]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on Perception of Indoor Air Quality During Immediate and Longer Whole‐Body Exposures , 1998 .

[16]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  The effect of a personalized ventilation system on perceived air quality and SBS symptoms , 2002 .

[17]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  The impact of a personalized ventilation system on indoor air quality at different levels of room air temperature , 2003 .

[18]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Individual thermal comfort control with desk-mounted and floor-mounted task/ambient conditioning (TAC) systems , 1999 .

[19]  D. Faulkner,et al.  Indoor airflow and pollutant removal in a room with floor-based task ventilation: Results of additional experiments , 1995 .

[20]  Tengfang T. Xu,et al.  A study of occupant cooling by personally controlled air movement , 1998 .

[21]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  INDIVIDUAL CONTROL AND PEOPLE'S PREFERENCES IN AN EXPERIMENT WITH A PERSONALIZED VENTILATION SYSTEM. , 2002 .