The influence of scoring method on variability in results obtained with the comet assay.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Amaya Azqueta | Gunnar Brunborg | Andrew Collins | Françoise Soussaline | G. Brunborg | F. Soussaline | A. Collins | K. Gutzkow | A. Azqueta | Silja Meier | Kristine Bjerve Gutzkow | Catherine Priestley | Jérôme Sallette | S. Meier | Catherine C. Priestley | J. Sallette
[1] David H Phillips,et al. Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. , 2010, Mutagenesis.
[2] A. Collins,et al. The kinetics of repair of oxidative DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised pyrimidines) in human cells. , 1995, Mutation research.
[3] N. Panneerselvam,et al. Genotoxicity of the herbicide fluchloralin on human lymphocytes in vitro: chromosomal aberration and micronucleus tests. , 1995, Mutation research.
[4] J M Bland,et al. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .
[5] G. Brunborg,et al. Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. , 2010, Toxicology letters.
[6] Steffen Loft,et al. Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring. , 2008, Mutagenesis.
[7] M. Dusinska,et al. Comet assay in human biomonitoring studies: Reliability, validation, and applications , 1997, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[8] Andrew Collins,et al. Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[9] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.