Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G Bordage,et al. Review criteria for research manuscripts. , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[2] Don C Des Jarlais,et al. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.
[3] P. Cantillon,et al. Monitoring the medical education revolution , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[4] K. Mann,et al. A RIME Perspective on the Quality and Relevance of Current and Future Medical Education Research , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[5] R. Pitkin,et al. Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality. , 2000, JAMA.
[6] Linda Hutchinson,et al. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions , 1999, BMJ.
[7] B. Djulbegovic,et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[8] N. Powe,et al. A Systematic Review of the Methodological Rigor of Studies Evaluating Cultural Competence Training of Health Professionals , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[9] D. Rennie. CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials. , 2001, JAMA.
[10] D. Prideaux,et al. Ethics approval for research in medical education , 2001, Medical education.
[11] Jean-Pierre EN Pierie,et al. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde , 1996, The Lancet.
[12] Douglas G Altman,et al. The content of medical journal Instructions for authors. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.
[13] R. Henry,et al. When Do Medical Students Become Human Subjects of Research? The Case of Program Evaluation , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[14] A. Caelleigh,et al. Reference to the Literature and Documentation , 2001 .
[15] Brendan Flanagan,et al. Making patient safety the focus: Crisis Resource Management in the undergraduate curriculum , 2004, Medical education.
[16] G. Norman. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments , 2003, Medical education.
[17] Jean Ker,et al. Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions , 1999, BMJ.
[18] R M Pitkin,et al. Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.
[19] G Bordage,et al. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction , 2001, Medical education.
[20] Edbert B. Hsu,et al. Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Educational Intervention Studies , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[21] Joel Gagnier,et al. The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement. , 2005, Contemporary clinical trials.
[22] F. Wolf. Methodological Quality, Evidence, and Research in Medical Education (RIME) , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[23] Douglas G Altman,et al. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[24] D Moher,et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.
[25] B Jolly,et al. Evidence‐based education: development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions , 1999, Medical education.
[26] Douglas G. Altman,et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.
[27] David W Nierenberg,et al. Educational epidemiology: applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. , 2004, JAMA.
[28] M. Drummond,et al. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet. , 1998, JAMA.
[29] B. Lo. Raising the Passing Grade for Studies of Medical Education , 2003 .
[30] J. McLachlan,et al. Ethical permission for the publication of routinely collected data , 2005, Medical education.
[31] Norman E. Wallen,et al. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .
[32] Peter Jüni,et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. , 2002, JAMA.
[33] S. Goodman,et al. Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[34] T. Jefferson,et al. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.
[35] William C. McGaghie,et al. Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question , 2001 .
[36] D. Altman. Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? , 2002, JAMA.
[37] I. Olkin,et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .
[38] David Prideaux,et al. Researching the outcomes of educational interventions: a matter of design , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[39] Veronica Yank,et al. Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials. , 2002, JAMA.
[40] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[41] Georges Bordage,et al. Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions , 2003, Medical education.
[42] D. Cook. The Research We Still Are Not Doing: An Agenda for the Study of Computer-Based Learning , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[43] D. Moher,et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[44] D. Rennie,et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[45] A. Haig,et al. BEME Guide No 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 1: Sources of information , 2003, Medical teacher.
[46] J. Fleiss,et al. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[47] J. Greenstone. Relevance , 2007 .
[48] A. Marušić,et al. Academic Advancement of Authors Receiving Tutoring From a Medical Journal , 2006, Teaching and learning in medicine.
[49] G. Parsell,et al. Research in medical education: finding its place , 1999, Medical education.
[50] R. Golub. Medical education 2005: from allegory to bull moose. , 2005, JAMA.
[51] D. Prideaux,et al. Research in medical education: asking the right questions , 2002, Medical education.
[52] Geoff Norman,et al. Research in medical education: three decades of progress , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[53] Helen Burstin,et al. A Call for Outcomes Research in Medical Education , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[54] J. Tomkowiak,et al. To IRB or Not to IRB? , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[55] D. Kern,et al. An emerging renaissance in medical education , 2004, Journal of general internal medicine.
[56] J. Morrison. Developing research questions in medical education: the science and the art , 2002, Medical education.
[57] S. Inouye,et al. An Evidence-Based Guide to Writing Grant Proposals for Clinical Research , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[58] C. E. Glassick,et al. Boyer's Expanded Definitions of Scholarship, the Standards for Assessing Scholarship, and the Elusiveness of the Scholarship of Teaching , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[59] L. Roberts,et al. An Invitation for Medical Educators to Focus on Ethical and Policy Issues in Research and Scholarly Practice , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[60] S Petersen,et al. Time for evidence based medical education , 1999, BMJ.
[61] G Bordage,et al. Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.