Review: Environmental impact of livestock farming and Precision Livestock Farming as a mitigation strategy.

This paper reviews the environmental impact of current livestock practices and discusses the advantages offered by Precision Livestock Farming (PLF), as a potential strategy to mitigate environmental risks. PLF is defined as: "the application of process engineering principles and techniques to livestock farming to automatically monitor, model and manage animal production". The primary goal of PLF is to make livestock farming more economically, socially and environmentally sustainable and this can be obtained through the observation, interpretation of behaviours and, if possible, individual control of animals. Furthermore, adopting PLF to support management strategies, may lead to the reduction of the environmental impact of farms. Currently, few studies reported PLF efficacy in reducing the environmental impact, however further studies are necessary to better analyze the actual potential of PLF as a mitigation strategy. Literature shows the potentiality of the application of PLF, as the introduction of PLF in farms can lead to a reduction of Greenhouse gases (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emission in air, nitrates and antibiotics pollution in water bodies, phosphorus, antibiotics and heavy metals in the soil.

[1]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[2]  G. Velthof,et al.  Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta‐analysis and integrated assessment , 2015, Global change biology.

[3]  J. Hadrich,et al.  A comparison of a novel time-based summary measure of dairy cow health against cumulative disease frequency , 2018, Irish Veterinary Journal.

[4]  Peter Demeyer,et al.  Reduction of ammonia emissions from dairy cattle cubicle houses via improved management- or design-based strategies: A modeling approach. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Wei Wang,et al.  Innovation, practical benefits and prospects for the future development of automatic milking systems , 2017 .

[6]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  Prioritizing alarms from sensor-based detection models in livestock production - A review on model performance and alarm reducing methods , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[7]  T. Itoh,et al.  Solid-state pH sensor prototype for real-time monitoring of the rumen pH value of Japanese cows , 2018 .

[8]  D. Moran,et al.  Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[9]  P. Hooda,et al.  A review of water quality concerns in livestock farming areas. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Manfred Trimborn,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry , 2006 .

[11]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health , 2014, Nature.

[12]  Melvyn L. Smith,et al.  Automated monitoring of dairy cow body condition, mobility and weight using a single 3D video capture device , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[13]  C. Martin,et al.  Effects of carbohydrate type or bicarbonate addition to grass silage-based diets on enteric methane emissions and milk fatty acid composition in dairy cows. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  L Loyon,et al.  Best available technology for European livestock farms: Availability, effectiveness and uptake. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  C. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of an activity and rumination monitor in dairy cattle grazing two types of forages , 2017 .

[16]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock production and the global environment: Consume less or produce better? , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[18]  Dong Cao,et al.  Behavioral features recognition and oestrus detection based on fast approximate clustering algorithm in dairy cows , 2017 .

[19]  J. Lloveras,et al.  Copper and Zinc Soil Accumulation and Plant Concentration in Irrigated Maize Fertilized with Liquid Swine Manure , 2008 .

[20]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[21]  M. Wagner,et al.  Differences between pH of indwelling sensors and the pH of fluid and solid phase in the rumen of dairy cows fed varying concentrate levels , 2018, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[22]  C. Pomar,et al.  Precision feeding can significantly reduce lysine intake and nitrogen excretion without compromising the performance of growing pigs. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[23]  E. Pajor,et al.  Behavior and productivity of cows milked in automated systems before diagnosis of health disorders in early lactation. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  X. Ai,et al.  Benefits and risks of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[25]  G. Bonazzi,et al.  Accumulation of copper and zinc from liquid manure in agricultural soils and crop plants , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[26]  Vasileios Exadaktylos,et al.  Early recognition of bovine respiratory disease in calves using automated continuous monitoring of cough sounds , 2016, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.

[27]  J. Neufeld,et al.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1970 .

[28]  J. Martínez,et al.  Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[29]  M. Hostens,et al.  Reproductive management in dairy cows - the future , 2018, Irish Veterinary Journal.

[30]  Olivier Therond,et al.  Livestock system sustainability and resilience in intensive production zones: which form of ecological modernization? , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[31]  M. Guarino,et al.  A pilot study to detect coccidiosis in poultry farms at early stage from air analysis , 2018, Biosystems Engineering.

[32]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[33]  A. P. Mucha,et al.  Can veterinary antibiotics affect constructed wetlands performance during treatment of livestock wastewater , 2017 .

[34]  Robin R. White,et al.  Precision diet formulation to improve performance and profitability across various climates: Modeling the implications of increasing the formulation frequency of dairy cattle diets. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[35]  Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp,et al.  Automatic detection of oestrus cows via breath sampling with an electronic nose: A pilot study , 2017 .

[36]  P. Gerber,et al.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[37]  C. L. Ventola The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. , 2015, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[38]  M. Guarino,et al.  Milk production Life Cycle Assessment: A comparison between estimated and measured emission inventory for manure handling. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  M. Endres,et al.  Technical note: Validation of an ear-tag accelerometer sensor to determine rumination, eating, and activity behaviors of grazing dairy cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  C. Burton The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure , 2007 .

[41]  K. Südekum,et al.  Invited review: Practical feeding management recommendations to mitigate the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cattle. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  E. Morgan,et al.  Control of helminth ruminant infections by 2030 , 2018, Parasitology.

[43]  Victor M. Zavala,et al.  Technologies and logistics for phosphorus recovery from livestock waste , 2018, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[44]  W. de Vries,et al.  Impacts of European livestock production: nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity , 2015 .

[45]  M. Vanotti,et al.  Removal of phosphorus from livestock effluents. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[46]  D. A. Oudendag,et al.  Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union , 2007 .

[47]  F. Dubeau,et al.  The impact of daily multiphase feeding on animal performance, body composition, nitrogen and phosphorus excretions, and feed costs in growing-finishing pigs. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[48]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Trends in Global Agricultural Land Use: Implications for Environmental Health and Food Security. , 2018, Annual review of plant biology.

[49]  D. Sridhar,et al.  Achieving global targets for antimicrobial resistance , 2016, Science.

[50]  Sarah J. Gerssen-Gondelach,et al.  Intensification pathways for beef and dairy cattle production systems : Impacts on GHG emissions, land occupation and land use change , 2017 .

[51]  S. O. Petersen,et al.  Dietary Nitrate for Methane Mitigation Leads to Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Dairy Cows. , 2015, Journal of environmental quality.

[52]  R. Bexiga,et al.  90. Precision livestock farming for reproductive performance optimization: a survey , 2016 .

[53]  A. Stott,et al.  Effects of changing cow production and fitness traits on profit and greenhouse gas emissions of UK dairy systems , 2014, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[54]  C. Martin,et al.  Relative reticulo-rumen pH indicators for subacute ruminal acidosis detection in dairy cows. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[55]  P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp,et al.  Integrated manure management to reduce environmental impact: II. Environmental impact assessment of strategies , 2015 .

[56]  S. Paudyal,et al.  Rumination time and monitoring of health disorders during early lactation. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[57]  G. Velthof,et al.  Feed use and nitrogen excretion of livestock in EU-27 , 2016 .

[58]  U. Sonesson,et al.  The environmental impact of mastitis: a case study of dairy herds. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  L. Lidauer,et al.  Evaluation of an ear-tag-based accelerometer for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[60]  Thomas Kaufmann,et al.  Sustainable livestock production: Low emission farm – The innovative combination of nutrient, emission and waste management with special emphasis on Chinese pig production , 2015, Animal nutrition.

[61]  W P Weiss,et al.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[62]  M. Spiteller,et al.  Metabolism and excretion kinetics of 14C-labeled and non-labeled difloxacin in pigs after oral administration, and antimicrobial activity of manure containing difloxacin and its metabolites. , 2009, Environmental research.

[63]  Eoin White,et al.  The effect of lameness on the environmental performance of milk production by rotational grazing. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[64]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Economic modelling to evaluate the benefits of precision livestock farming technologies , 2014 .

[65]  C. Rosen,et al.  Antibiotic uptake by plants from soil fertilized with animal manure. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[66]  F. Lebeau,et al.  Influences of feeding behaviour and forage quality on diurnal methane emission dynamics of grazing cows , 2017 .

[67]  M. Heitz,et al.  A review of the environmental pollution originating from the piggery industry and of the available mitigation technologies: towards the simultaneous biofiltration of swine slurry and methane , 2014 .

[68]  Francesco Fioranelli,et al.  Animal Lameness Detection With Radar Sensing , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[69]  A. Madureira,et al.  Daily lying behavior of lactating Holstein cows during an estrus synchronization protocol and its associations with fertility. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[70]  D. He,et al.  Automatic lameness detection in dairy cattle based on leg swing analysis with an image processing technique , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[71]  A. Lurette,et al.  Automatic oestrus detection system enables monitoring of sexual behaviour in sheep , 2017 .

[72]  T. Ren,et al.  Antibiotic residues in liquid manure from swine feedlot and their effects on nearby groundwater in regions of North China , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[73]  Relationships between rumination time, metabolic conditions, and health status in dairy cows during the transition period. , 2012 .

[74]  David Kelton,et al.  Recent advancement in biosensors technology for animal and livestock health management. , 2017, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[75]  Jian Lu,et al.  Low-Power Highly Sensitive pH Sensor With $\mu$ dots Protective Structures for Monitoring Rumen in Cows in Real-Time , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[76]  S. Shields,et al.  The Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies on Animal Welfare , 2015, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[77]  Mingqing Pan,et al.  Fate of antibiotics in soil and their uptake by edible crops. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[78]  H. Aguirre-Villegas,et al.  Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools , 2017 .

[79]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study , 2012 .

[80]  A. Antón,et al.  Different approaches to assess the environmental performance of a cow manure biogas plant , 2018 .

[81]  E. Humer,et al.  Signals for identifying cows at risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy veterinary practice , 2018, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[82]  J. Hartung,et al.  Survey of ammonia concentrations in livestock buildings , 1999, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[83]  Claudia Arcidiacono,et al.  A software tool for the automatic and real-time analysis of cow velocity data in free-stall barns: The case study of oestrus detection from Ultra-Wide-Band data , 2017, Biosystems Engineering.

[84]  Anthony King,et al.  Technology: The Future of Agriculture , 2017, Nature.

[85]  Ilias Kyriazakis,et al.  Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs , 2016, Veterinary journal.

[86]  T. Misselbrook,et al.  Managing ammonia emissions from livestock production in Europe. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[87]  D. Berckmans,et al.  Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems. , 2014, Revue scientifique et technique.

[88]  Dries Berckmans,et al.  General introduction to precision livestock farming , 2017 .

[89]  Jan Siemens,et al.  Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. , 2014, Trends in microbiology.

[90]  He Dongjian,et al.  Intelligent monitoring method of cow ruminant behavior based on video analysis technology , 2017 .

[91]  E. Humer,et al.  Technical note: Changes in rumen mucosa thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound as a noninvasive method to diagnose subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[92]  Claude B. Courbois,et al.  Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution , 2001 .

[93]  J. Erisman,et al.  Agricultural air quality in Europe and the future perspectives , 2008 .

[94]  Jasmeet Kaler,et al.  Drivers for precision livestock technology adoption: A study of factors associated with adoption of electronic identification technology by commercial sheep farmers in England and Wales , 2018, PloS one.

[95]  Pete Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector , 2016 .

[96]  Alain N. Rousseau,et al.  Rethinking environment control strategy of confined animal housing systems through precision livestock farming , 2017 .

[97]  Dries Berckmans,et al.  Precision livestock farming for pigs , 2017 .

[98]  F. Hao,et al.  Heavy metal loss from agricultural watershed to aquatic system: A scientometrics review. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[99]  J. R. Knapp,et al.  Impact of Trace Mineral Variation within Forages on the Ration Formulation Process , 2015 .

[100]  L. Shalloo,et al.  Evaluation of the RumiWatchSystem for measuring grazing behaviour of cows , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[101]  A. Madureira,et al.  Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[102]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Application note: Labelling, a methodology to develop reliable algorithm in PLF , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[103]  Suzelle Barrington,et al.  Livestock waste treatment systems for environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[104]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Impact of diet and fertility on greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen efficiency of milk production , 2017 .

[105]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Effects of grass silage quality and level of feed intake on enteric methane production in lactating dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[106]  Filippo Gambella,et al.  Energy and Carbon Impact of Precision Livestock Farming Technologies Implementation in the Milk Chain: From Dairy Farm to Cheese Factory , 2017 .

[107]  D. Drissner,et al.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Agriculture , 2016, mBio.

[108]  C. Pomar,et al.  Feeding behavior of growing-finishing pigs reared under precision feeding strategies. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[109]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Appropriate data visualisation is key to Precision Livestock Farming acceptance , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[110]  Fei Li,et al.  Waste from livestock and poultry breeding and its potential assessment of biogas energy in rural China , 2016 .

[111]  Tatiane Branco,et al.  Application of a precision nutrition tool for growing and finishing pigs , 2017 .

[112]  M. Mallin,et al.  Industrial Swine and Poultry Production Causes Chronic Nutrient and Fecal Microbial Stream Pollution , 2015, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[113]  Claudia Bahr,et al.  Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 2. Use of Sensors to Automatically Register Changes in Locomotion or Behavior , 2015, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[114]  T. Mcallister,et al.  Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis , 2008 .

[115]  Q. Shen,et al.  Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance from animal manures to soil: a review , 2018 .

[116]  P. Balsari,et al.  Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation , 2008 .

[117]  F. Mitloehner,et al.  Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies , 2016, Climatic Change.

[118]  G. Dantas,et al.  The Shared Antibiotic Resistome of Soil Bacteria and Human Pathogens , 2012, Science.

[119]  J. Dourmad,et al.  The impact of feeding growing-finishing pigs with reduced dietary protein levels on performance, carcass traits, meat quality and environmental impacts , 2017 .

[120]  Søren O. Petersen,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production , 2006 .

[121]  A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi,et al.  Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation , 2017 .

[122]  J. S. Radcliffe,et al.  Animal management to reduce phosphorus losses to the environment. , 2004, Journal of Animal Science.

[123]  Xiang Zhao,et al.  Environmental analysis of typical antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ARGs in farmland soil chronically fertilized with chicken manure. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[124]  Q. Shen,et al.  Long-term effects of manure and chemical fertilizers on soil antibiotic resistome , 2018, Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

[125]  A. Dobermann Looking Forward to 2030 : Nitrogen and the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016 .