Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses

ABSTRACT The optical performance of one monofocal and five multifocal lenses was evaluated in the laboratory and photographically. The laboratory testing included determination of the modulation transfer function (INITF), through focus response (TFR), resolution efficiency, and Strehl ratio of each lens. The photographic testing included photographs of the Regan high contrast acuity chart at ten feet with clearest focus and 18 additional photographs in which the image was defocused using minus trial lenses in 0.25 diopter increments. A color photograph of the Kodak color chart was also taken using each lens. All testing was conducted using a 3 mm artificial pupil under ideal implant conditions with no decentration or tilt. The laboratory and photographic results demonstrate that all the multifocal lenses had a two‐ to three‐fold increase in the depth of field with at least a 50% lower contrast in the retinal image. The photographic testing revealed aone to two line better resolution limit with the monofocal lens, which corresponded to the 12% to 41% better MTF cut‐off value with the monofocal lens by laboratory testing. The measured resolution efficiencies of all six lenses were comparable. The color photographs revealed color mixing of adjacent colors vvith the multifocal lenses, whereas the colors appeared unchanged from the original with the monofocal lens.

[1]  C. Boerner,et al.  Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes. , 1984, Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society.

[2]  C. Huber Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. , 1981, Journal - American Intra-Ocular Implant Society.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[4]  P. Percival Indications for the multizone bifocal implant , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  D. Worthen,et al.  The FDA report on intraocular lenses. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  T. Olsen,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  M Nakazawa,et al.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. , 1983, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  R. Lehmann Paired comparison of contrast sensitivity in diffractive multifocal IOLs and conventional monofocal IOLs. , 1990, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Holladay,et al.  Silicone intraocular lens resolution in air and in water , 1988, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  J. Holladay,et al.  Intraocular lens resolution in air and water , 1987, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  M Nakazawa,et al.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.