Homeostatic Control on the Thought: a Comprehensive Explanation of Mind Wandering

Our thoughts are inherently dynamic, often wandering far from the current situation. Mind-wandering (MW), which is these thought transitions, is crucial for understanding the nature of human thought. Although previous research has identified various factors influencing MW, a comprehensive framework integrating these findings remains absent. Here, we propose that homeostasis has the potential to explain MW and validate the idea through simulations by replicating previous findings. We employed a homeostatic reinforcement learning model where independent drives for the task and others were assigned, and drive reduction became a reward and trained under sustained attention to the response task. We confirmed that the model behaves consistently with the empirical results reported in human experiments, suggesting that the model accurately captures the underlying mechanism of MW. Finally, we discuss the behavioral and neurobiological commonality between human thought and animal behavior and the possibility that the same principle, homeostasis, controls these phenomena.

[1]  Yunyun Chen,et al.  The role of focus back effort in the relationships among motivation, interest, and mind wandering: an individual difference perspective , 2023, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[2]  Kenji F. Tanaka,et al.  Mesolimbic dopamine release precedes actively sought aversive stimuli in mice , 2023, Nature communications.

[3]  Wojciech Zajkowski,et al.  The role of the salience network in cognitive and affective deficits , 2023, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Umeda,et al.  Coexistence of thought types as an attentional state during a sustained attention task , 2023, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Anterior insula as a gatekeeper of executive control , 2022, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[6]  Guillermo Campoy,et al.  Propensity to intentional and unintentional mind-wandering differs in arousal and executive vigilance tasks , 2021, PloS one.

[7]  J. Shine,et al.  The ascending arousal system shapes neural dynamics to mediate awareness of cognitive states , 2021, Nature Communications.

[8]  Koji Toda,et al.  Habit formation viewed as structural change in the behavioral network , 2021, bioRxiv.

[9]  Yuichi Yamashita,et al.  Computational Mechanisms of Osmoregulation: A Reinforcement Learning Model for Sodium Appetite , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  K. Tye,et al.  The neural circuitry of social homeostasis: Consequences of acute versus chronic social isolation , 2021, Cell.

[11]  C. M. Zedelius,et al.  Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty , 2021, Psychological research.

[12]  A. Jha,et al.  Experience sampling of the degree of mind wandering distinguishes hidden attentional states , 2019, Cognition.

[13]  William W. Seeley,et al.  The Salience Network: A Neural System for Perceiving and Responding to Homeostatic Demands , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Hugo D. Critchley,et al.  Response time as a proxy of ongoing mental state: A combined fMRI and pupillometry study in Generalized Anxiety Disorder , 2019, NeuroImage.

[15]  Margaret E. Beier,et al.  Multiple routes to mind wandering: Predicting mind wandering with resource theories , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  The role of task difficulty in theoretical accounts of mind wandering , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Negative mood and mind wandering increase long-range temporal correlations in attention fluctuations , 2018, PloS one.

[18]  Y. Weinstein Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[19]  Thomas P. Reber,et al.  Mind wandering simultaneously prolongs reactions and promotes creative incubation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  What did you have in mind? Examining the content of intentional and unintentional types of mind wandering , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  S. Buetti,et al.  Distractibility is a function of engagement, not task difficulty: Evidence from a new oculomotor capture paradigm. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Zachary C. Irving,et al.  Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  A Neural Model of Mind Wandering , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Fluctuating Minds: Spontaneous Psychophysical Variability during Mind-Wandering , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering , 2016, Memory & Cognition.

[26]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Mehdi Keramati,et al.  Homeostatic reinforcement learning for integrating reward collection and physiological stability , 2014, eLife.

[28]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind , 2014, Science.

[29]  Peter Totterdell,et al.  Mind-wandering and negative mood: Does one thing really lead to another? , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  Mikaël Bastian,et al.  Mind wandering at the fingertips: automatic parsing of subjective states based on response time variability , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[31]  D. Besner,et al.  In pursuit of off-task thought: mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Benjamin W. Mooneyham,et al.  The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[33]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Natasha M. Maurits,et al.  Mental Fatigue Affects Visual Selective Attention , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  D. Gilbert,et al.  A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind , 2010, Science.

[37]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[38]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Ryan D Ward,et al.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis. , 2006, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[43]  R. Shull,et al.  Bouts of responding on variable-interval schedules: effects of deprivation level. , 2004, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  R. Shull,et al.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[45]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance , 1974 .

[46]  M. Wayner,et al.  Schedule induced behavior in humans. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[47]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Instrumental and contingent saccharin-licking in rats: Response deprivation and reinforcement , 1973 .

[48]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[49]  David A. Levitsky,et al.  Schedule-induced wheel running , 1968 .

[50]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation? , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  K. Breland,et al.  The misbehavior of organisms. , 1961 .

[52]  T. F. Gilbert Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant. , 1958, Psychological review.

[53]  B. Skinner Superstition in the pigeon. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  E. Guthrie Conditioning as a principle of learning. , 1930 .

[55]  D. Smilek,et al.  Mind wandering, motivation, and task performance over time: Evidence that motivation insulates people from the negative effects of mind wandering. , 2020 .

[56]  W. Baum Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency. , 2012, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[57]  E. Higgins,et al.  Where Does Value Come From , 2008 .

[58]  E. Eisenstein,et al.  A Behavioral Homeostasis Theory of Habituation and Sensitization: II. Further Developments and Predictions , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[59]  P. Killeen,et al.  A behavioral theory of timing. , 1988, Psychological review.

[60]  J. Staddon Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. , 1979 .

[61]  J. Falk,et al.  Schedule-induced polydipsia as a function of fixed interval length. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.