An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream

People are extremely proficient at recognizing faces that are familiar to them, but are much worse at matching unfamiliar faces. We used fMR-adaptation to ask whether this difference in recognition might be reflected by an image-invariant representation for familiar faces in face-selective regions of the human ventral visual processing stream. Consistent with models of face processing, we found adaptation to repeated images of the same face image in the fusiform face area (FFA), but not in the superior-temporal face region (STS). To establish if the neural representation in the FFA was invariant to changes in view, we presented different images of the same face. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the response in the FFA to different images of the same person was the same as the response to images of different people. A group analysis showed a distributed pattern of adaptation to the same image of a face, which extended beyond the face-selective areas, including other regions of the ventral visual stream. However, this analysis failed to reveal any regions showing significant image-invariant adaptation. These results suggest that information about faces is represented in a distributed network using an image-dependent neural code.

[1]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence , 2005, NeuroImage.

[2]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Visual Cortex: How Are Faces and Objects Represented? , 2005, Current Biology.

[5]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociating Task Performance from fMRI Repetition Attenuation in Ventral Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition priming of face recognition , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[17]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[21]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Frank Tong,et al.  The Face of Controversy , 2001, Science.

[24]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. , 2010, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  Bruce,et al.  Repetition priming of face recognition , 1994 .

[33]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .