Covid-19 trajectories: Monitoring pandemic in the worldwide context

Background: Covid-19 pandemic is developing worldwide with common dynamics but also with partly marked differences between regions and countries. They are not completely understood, but presumably, provide one clue to find ways to mitigate epidemics until exit strategies to its eradication become available. Method: We provide a monitoring tool available at www.izbi.de. It enables inspection of the dynamic state of the epidemic in 187 countries using trajectories. They visualize transmission and removal rates of the epidemic and this way bridge epi-curve tracking with modelling approaches. Results: Examples were provided which characterize state of epidemic in different regions of the world in terms of fast and slow growing and decaying regimes and estimate associated rate factors. Basic spread of the disease associates with transmission between two individuals every two-three days on the average. Non-pharmaceutical interventions decrease this value to up to ten days where complete lock down measures are required to stop the epidemic. Comparison of trajectories revealed marked differences between the countries regarding efficiency of measures taken against the epidemic. Trajectories also reveal marked country-specific dynamics of recovery and death rates. Conclusions: The results presented refer to the pandemic state in May 2020 and can serve as working instruction for timely monitoring using the interactive monitoring tool as a sort of seismometer for the evaluation of the state of epidemic, e.g., the possible effect of measures taken in both, lock-down and lock-up directions. Comparison of trajectories between countries and regions will support developing hypotheses and models to better understand regional differences of dynamics of Covid-19.

[1]  C. Viboud,et al.  Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge. , 2016, Epidemics.

[2]  Frank Ball,et al.  The disease-induced herd immunity level for Covid-19 is substantially lower than the classical herd immunity level , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  Robert J. Cerfolio,et al.  Factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103 patients with COVID-19 disease in New York City , 2020, medRxiv.

[4]  P. Sen,et al.  Covid-19 spread: Reproduction of data and prediction using a SIR model on Euclidean network. , 2020, 2003.07063.

[5]  G. Barbastathis,et al.  Quantifying the effect of quarantine control in Covid-19 infectious spread using machine learning , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  Jacques Fellay,et al.  A Global Effort to Define the Human Genetics of Protective Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Infection , 2020, Cell.

[7]  Zachary Chase Lipton,et al.  The Covid-Tracking Project , 2020 .

[8]  M. Roser,et al.  Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) , 2020 .

[9]  C. Fraser Estimating Individual and Household Reproduction Numbers in an Emerging Epidemic , 2007, PloS one.

[10]  Johannes Zierenberg,et al.  Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions , 2020, Science.

[11]  Michael Meyer-Hermann,et al.  Estimate of the development of the epidemic reproduction number Rt from Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 case data and implications for political measures based on prognostics , 2020, medRxiv.

[12]  B. Plachter,et al.  Projecting the spread of COVID-19 for Germany , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe , 2020, Nature.

[14]  A. Ing,et al.  COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton , 2020, Thorax.

[15]  Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team,et al.  Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in European countries: technical description update , 2020, 2004.11342.

[16]  Maria Vittoria Barbarossa,et al.  A first study on the impact of current and future control measures on the spread of COVID-19 in Germany , 2020, medRxiv.

[17]  J. Fuhrmann,et al.  The impact of current and future control measures on the spread of COVID-19 in Germany , 2020, medRxiv.

[18]  Autocatalytic Model for Covid-19 Progression in a Country , 2020, medRxiv.

[19]  Kevin A. Brown,et al.  Estimating the effect of physical distancing on the COVID-19 pandemic using an urban mobility index , 2020, medRxiv.

[20]  D. Brockmann,et al.  Effective containment explains subexponential growth in recent confirmed COVID-19 cases in China , 2020, Science.

[21]  S. Reich,et al.  Sequential Data Assimilation of the Stochastic SEIR Epidemic Model for Regional COVID-19 Dynamics , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[22]  Johannes Zierenberg,et al.  Inferring change points in the COVID-19 spreading reveals the effectiveness of interventions , 2020 .

[23]  Evaluation of the Secondary Transmission Pattern and Epidemic Prediction of COVID-19 in the Four Metropolitan Areas of China , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[24]  Wang Jianwei,et al.  Extended SIR Prediction of the Epidemics Trend of COVID-19 in Italy and Compared With Hunan, China , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[25]  P. Horby,et al.  Features of 16,749 hospitalised UK patients with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol , 2020, medRxiv.

[26]  Cheng-Shang Chang,et al.  A Time-dependent SIR model for COVID-19 , 2020, ArXiv.

[27]  D. Brockmann,et al.  Effective containment explains subexponential growth in recent confirmed COVID-19 cases in China , 2020, Science.

[28]  Rob Phillips,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by the numbers , 2020, eLife.

[29]  Ewa Skubalska-Rafajłowicz,et al.  Mitigation and herd immunity strategy for COVID-19 is likely to fail , 2020, medRxiv.

[30]  Junling Ma Estimating epidemic exponential growth rate and basic reproduction number , 2020, Infectious Disease Modelling.