Experimental Validation of a Massive Educational Service in a Blended Learning Environment

New information and communication technologies offer today many opportunities to improve the quality of educational services in universities and in particular they allow to design and implement innovative learning models. This paper describes and validates our university blended learning model, and specifically the massive educational video service that we offer to our students since 2010. In these years, we have gathered a huge amount of detailed data about the students' access to the service, and the paper describes a number of analyses that we carried out with these data. The common goal was to find out experimentally whether the main objectives of the educational video service we had in our mind when we designed it, namely appreciation, effectiveness and flexibility, were reflected by the users' behavior. We analyzed how many students used the service, for how many courses, and how many videos they accessed within a course (appreciation of the service). We analyzed the correlation between the use of the service and the performance of the students in terms of successful examination rate and average mark (effectiveness of the service). Finally, by using data mining techniques we profiled users according to their behavior while accessing the educational video service. We found out six different patterns that reflect different uses of the services matching different learning goals (flexibility of the service). The results of these analyses show the quality of the proposed blended learning model and the coherency of its implementation with respect to the design goals.

[1]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Analyzing navigation logs in MOOC: a case study , 2016, TEEM.

[2]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Analytics on video-based learning , 2013, LAK '13.

[3]  Qing Chen,et al.  Visual Analytics for MOOC Data , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  René F. Kizilcec,et al.  Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Delving into Participants’ Profiles and Use of Social Tools in MOOCs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[6]  Judy Kay,et al.  MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential ... , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[7]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Collecting and making sense of video learning analytics , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[8]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs) , 2015, LAK.

[9]  Zhenming Liu,et al.  Learning about Social Learning in MOOCs: From Statistical Analysis to Generative Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[10]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  An architecture for extending the learning analytics support in the Khan Academy framework , 2013, TEEM '13.

[11]  Dit-Yan Yeung,et al.  Temporal Models for Predicting Student Dropout in Massive Open Online Courses , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW).

[12]  Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al.  Data science foundry for MOOCs , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA).

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Mining MOOC Clickstreams: Video-Watching Behavior vs. In-Video Quiz Performance , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Introduction to smart learning analytics: foundations and developments in video-based learning , 2016, Smart Learning Environments.

[15]  Qing Chen,et al.  PeakVizor: Visual Analytics of Peaks in Video Clickstreams from Massive Open Online Courses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[17]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  How Blended Learning Reduces Underachievement in Higher Education: An Experience in Teaching Computer Sciences , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.