Understanding Technology Support for Organizational Transactive Memory: Requirements, Application, and Customization

Transactive memory is an effective mechanism for locating and coordinating expertise in small groups and has been shown to hold numerous benefits for groups and organizations. To extend transactive memory beyond the scope of small groups, researchers have proposed the use of information technology (IT). This paper provides an integrated discussion of our knowledge from three studies concerning IT support in transactive memory in organizations. Focusing on meta-memory, which is at the heart of transactive memory systems, we examine what meta-memory is maintained by members of transactive memory systems, whether providing this meta-memory in a technology-mediated environment can lead to transactive memory development, whether IT can realistically provide this meta-memory, and whether different requirements exist for different users and in different stages of transactive memory development. We discuss the implications of these studies to both research and practice.

[1]  Santa Clara,et al.  Research Issues in Social Computing * , 2007 .

[2]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Y. Connie Yuan,et al.  Access to Information in Connective and Communal Transactive Memory Systems , 2007, Commun. Res..

[5]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[6]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Developments in Practice XXVI: Social Networks: Knowledge Management's "Killer App"? , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Venture Capitalists' Assessment of New Venture Survival , 1999 .

[8]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Lee Sproull,et al.  More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Social Tagging and Self-Tagging for Impression Management * , 2006 .

[11]  Miguel Pina e Cunha,et al.  Weblog-Technology as a Trigger to Elicit Passion for Knowledge , 2007 .

[12]  M. Dasborough.  Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization. , 2004 .

[13]  Allan Ahlberg.  Who Knows? , 1999, Security Protocols Workshop.

[14]  Yair Wand,et al.  Organizational memory information systems: a transactive memory approach , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[16]  John Byrne,et al.  Transactive memory system in new product development teams , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[18]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  A. Hollingshead.  Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[23]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[24]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Corporate wiki users: results of a survey , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[25]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management , 1998 .

[26]  Vesa Peltokorpi,et al.  Transactive memory directories in small work units , 2004 .

[27]  Doug Schuler,et al.  Social computing , 1994, CACM.

[28]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Investigating the Encoding Process of Transactive Memory Development in Group Training , 2000 .

[29]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Exploring Meta-Knowledge for Knowledge Management Systems: A Delphi Study , 2003, ICIS.

[31]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  John Byrne,et al.  Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Kyle Lewis.  Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[37]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[38]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[39]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[40]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Nederlandse samenvatting en bewerking van 'Multivariate data analysis, 4th Edition, 1995' , 1998 .

[41]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[43]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Information Systems Project Continuation in Escalation Situations: A Real Options Model , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[45]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY SYSTEMS AND COLLECTIVE MIND IN VIRTUAL TEAMS , 2001 .

[47]  M. Adler,et al.  Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health , 1996 .

[48]  A. Hollingshead.  Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[49]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Pick me!: link selection in expertise search results , 2008, CHI.

[51]  Roderick E. White,et al.  Know‐how transfer: the role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors , 2008 .

[52]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[53]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[54]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  SmallBlue: Social Network Analysis for Expertise Search and Collective Intelligence , 2009, 2009 IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[56]  LewisKyle.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams , 2004 .

[57]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[58]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: A Case Study of Employee Blogging , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[59]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[60]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[61]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[62]  Laurie E. Damianos,et al.  Exploring the Adoption, Utility, and Social Influences of Social Bookmarking in a Corporate Environment , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[63]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[64]  Pradeep Racherla,et al.  Network Externalities and Technology Use: A Quantitative Analysis of Intraorganizational Blogs , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[66]  Hong-Hee Lee,et al.  Corporate blogging strategies of the Fortune 500 companies , 2006 .

[67]  R. Cross,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. , 2002 .

[68]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[69]  L. Lawley.  Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk , 2006 .

[70]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Knowledge Demands of Expertise Seekers in Two Different Contexts: Knowledge Allocation versus Knowledge Retrieval , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.