Position-specific propensities of amino acids in the β-strand

BackgroundDespite the importance of β-strands as main building blocks in proteins, the propensity of amino acid in β-strands is not well-understood as it has been more difficult to determine experimentally compared to α-helices. Recent studies have shown that most of the amino acids have significantly high or low propensity towards both ends of β-strands. However, a comprehensive analysis of the sequence dependent amino acid propensities at positions between the ends of the β-strand has not been investigated.ResultsThe propensities of the amino acids calculated from a large non-redundant database of proteins are found to be highly position-specific and vary continuously throughout the length of the β-strand. They follow an unexpected characteristic periodic pattern in inner positions with respect to the cap residues in both termini of β-strands; this periodic nature is markedly different from that of the α-helices with respect to the strength and pattern in periodicity. This periodicity is not only different for different amino acids but it also varies considerably for the amino acids belonging to the same physico-chemical group. Average hydrophobicity is also found to be periodic with respect to the positions from both termini of β-strands.ConclusionsThe results contradict the earlier perception of isotropic nature of amino acid propensities in the middle region of β-strands. These position-specific propensities should be of immense help in understanding the factors responsible for β-strand design and efficient prediction of β-strand structure in unknown proteins.

[1]  U. Hobohm,et al.  Enlarged representative set of protein structures , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  J. Richardson,et al.  Corrections: Amino Acid Preferences for Specific Locations at the Ends of α Helices , 1988 .

[3]  Uwe Sauer,et al.  Dissection of helix capping in T4 lysozyme by structural and thermodynamic analysis of six amino acid substitutions at Thr 59 , 1993 .

[4]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Position dependence of non-polar amino acid intrinsic helical propensities. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Min Huang,et al.  Position‐specific residue preference features around the ends of helices and strands and a novel strategy for the prediction of secondary structures , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Dissecting α‐helices: Position‐specific analysis of α‐helices in globular proteins , 1998, Proteins.

[7]  P Argos,et al.  Amino acid distribution in protein secondary structures. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[8]  P. Lyu,et al.  Capping interactions in isolated alpha helices: position-dependent substitution effects and structure of a serine-capped peptide helix. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[9]  L. Serrano,et al.  Amino acid intrinsic α‐helical propensities III: Positional dependence at several positions of C terminus , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  B. Rost.  Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[11]  G. Rose,et al.  Helix signals in proteins. , 1988, Science.

[12]  J. Jung,et al.  Protein structure prediction. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[13]  N. Sreerama,et al.  Estimation of the number of α‐helical and β‐strand segments in proteins using circular dichroism spectroscopy , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Protein structure prediction in 2002. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  S. Yoshikawa,et al.  Stabilization of α-Helix in C-Terminal Fragments of Neuropeptide Y , 1993 .

[16]  L Serrano,et al.  Position dependence of amino acid intrinsic helical propensities II: Non‐charged polar residues: Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  W. Braun,et al.  Sequence specificity, statistical potentials, and three‐dimensional structure prediction with self‐correcting distance geometry calculations of β‐sheet formation in proteins , 2008 .

[18]  Charles Tanford,et al.  The hydrophobic effect , 1980 .

[19]  Acr Martin,et al.  Amino Acid Pairing Preferences in Parallel β-Sheets in Proteins , 2006 .

[20]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[21]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Capping and α-helix stability , 1989, Nature.

[22]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  N‐ and C‐capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α‐helical peptides , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. , 1993, Science.

[24]  A. Fersht,et al.  Effect of alanine versus glycine in α-helices on protein stability , 1992, Nature.

[25]  J Moult,et al.  Predicting protein three-dimensional structure. , 1999, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[26]  S L Mayo,et al.  Intrinsic beta-sheet propensities result from van der Waals interactions between side chains and the local backbone. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.

[28]  A. Doig,et al.  Effect of the N1 residue on the stability of the α‐helix for all 20 amino acids , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  R. Schulz,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction , 2020, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[30]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Side‐chain conformational entropy in protein folding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  Michael B. Hall,et al.  A reexamination of the propensities of amino acids towards a particular secondary structure: classification of amino acids based on their chemical structure , 2008, Journal of molecular modeling.

[32]  Simon J. Hubbard,et al.  Improved prediction for N‐termini of α‐helices using empirical information , 2004 .

[33]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  François Major,et al.  Ranking the factors that contribute to protein β‐sheet folding , 2007 .

[35]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[36]  M. Hecht,et al.  Binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids in the sequences and structures of native proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Hydrogen bond strength and β‐sheet propensities: The role of a side chain blocking effect , 1994, Proteins.

[38]  William F. DeGrado,et al.  Amino Acid Propensities are Position-dependent Throughout the Length of α-Helices , 2004 .

[39]  S. Yoshikawa,et al.  Factors that affect the stabilization of alpha-helices in short peptides by a capping box. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[40]  Yael Mandel-Gutfreund,et al.  On the significance of alternating patterns of polar and non-polar residues in beta-strands. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Z. Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  Robert L. Baldwin,et al.  Relative helix-forming tendencies of nonpolar amino acids , 1990, Nature.

[43]  T. Creighton.  Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties , 1986 .

[44]  Marta Bunster,et al.  Prediction of secondary structure of proteins by means of hydrophobicity profiles , 1982 .

[45]  U. Sauer,et al.  Dissection of helix capping in T4 lysozyme by structural and thermodynamic analysis of six amino acid substitutions at Thr 59. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[46]  M. Levitt,et al.  Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J Moult,et al.  Role of electrostatic screening in determining protein main chain conformational preferences. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[48]  Xiaozhen Hu,et al.  Computer-based redesign of a beta sandwich protein suggests that extensive negative design is not required for de novo beta sheet design. , 2008, Structure.

[49]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  Local hydrophobicity stabilizes secondary structures in proteins , 1980, Biopolymers.

[50]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Helix capping propensities in peptides parallel those in proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  Conformation of twisted β-pleated sheets in proteins , 1973 .

[52]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  Andrei L Lomize,et al.  Bmc Structural Biology , 2022 .

[54]  J. Ha,et al.  Role of the hydrophobic effect in stability of site-specific protein-DNA complexes. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  B. Honig,et al.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel beta-sheets. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  T. Creamer,et al.  Solvation energies of amino acid side chains and backbone in a family of host-guest pentapeptides. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[57]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Rules for alpha-helix termination by glycine. , 1994, Science.

[58]  B. Forood,et al.  Stabilization of alpha-helical structures in short peptides via end capping. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Flexibility of α-Helices: Results of a Statistical Analysis of Database Protein Structures , 2003 .

[60]  V. Rich.  A little knowledge … , 1975, Nature.

[61]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Determination of free energies of N-capping in alpha-helices by modification of the Lifson-Roig helix-coil therapy to include N- and C-capping. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[62]  Taehyo Kim,et al.  Mean curvature as a major determinant of ß-sheet propensity , 2006, Bioinform..

[63]  J. Richardson,et al.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. , 1988, Science.

[64]  D. Pal,et al.  β-Sheet propensity and its correlation withparameters based on conformation , 2000 .

[65]  J. Lecomte,et al.  Helix formation in apocytochrome b5: the role of a neutral histidine at the N-cap position , 1991 .

[66]  Hamid Pezeshk,et al.  β-Sheet capping: Signals that initiate and terminate β-sheet formation , 2008 .

[67]  M. Hecht,et al.  Periodicity of polar and nonpolar amino acids is the major determinant of secondary structure in self-assembling oligomeric peptides. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  A. Doig,et al.  Side-chain structures in the first turn of the alpha-helix. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Flexibility of β‐sheets: Principal component analysis of database protein structures , 2004, Proteins.

[70]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical ϕ–ψ matrices: Comparison with experimental scales , 1994 .