A qualitative analysis of reflective and defensive student responses in a software engineering and design course

For students encountering difficult material, reflective practice is considered to play an important role in their learning. However, students in this situation sometimes do not behave reflectively, but in less productive and more problematic ways. This paper investigates how educators can recognize and analyze students' confusion, and determine whether students are responding reflectively or defensively. Qualitative data for the investigation comes from an upper-level undergraduate software engineering and design course that students invariably find quite challenging. A phenomenological analysis of the data, based on Heidegger's dynamic of rupture, provides useful insight to students' experience. A clearer understanding of the concepts presented in this paper should enable faculty to bring a more sophisticated analysis to student feedback, and lead to a more informed and productive interpretation by both instructor and administration.

[1]  Anders Berglund,et al.  On the understanding of computer network protocols , 2002 .

[2]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[3]  J. Mezirow,et al.  How Critical Reflection Triggers Transformative Learning , 2002 .

[4]  Griselda Pollock,et al.  Thinking sociologically , 2007 .

[5]  Stephen Brookfield,et al.  Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. , 1989 .

[6]  David Lorge Parnas.  The Professional Responsibilities of Software Engineers , 1994, IFIP Congress.

[7]  Amer Diwan,et al.  The conversational classroom , 2003, SIGCSE.

[8]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[9]  R. Land.  Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (1): linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines , 2003 .

[10]  Anders Berglund,et al.  What do we mean by theoretically sound research in computer science education? , 2004, ITiCSE '04.

[11]  S. Brookfield.  Becoming a critically reflective teacher , 1995 .

[12]  S. Segal,et al.  The Existential Conditions of Explicitness: an Heideggerian perspective , 1999 .

[13]  David Boud,et al.  Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context , 1998 .

[14]  S. Atkins,et al.  Reflection: a review of the literature. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[15]  Larrie Greenberg,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: Reaching for Excellence in Practice , 2005, Pediatrics.

[16]  D. Boud.  Using Journal Writing to Enhance Reflective Practice , 2001 .

[17]  Jack Mezirow,et al.  Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning , 1990 .

[18]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[19]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[20]  Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche,et al.  Twilight of the Idols , 1889 .

[21]  Shirley Booth,et al.  On Phenomenography, Learning and Teaching , 1997 .

[22]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[23]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Novice mistakes: are the folk wisdoms correct? , 1986, CACM.

[24]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. , 1990 .

[25]  Lindsay Barrett,et al.  Twilight of the idols , 2008 .