Managing Inter-Activities in CSCW: Supporting Users Emerging Needs in the COOLDA Platform

The CSCW research domain still tries to find a better way for supporting the users needs. Some groupware systems propose global and integrated environments supporting collaborative activities, but empirical studies show that these environments usually omit to support some dimensions of the work. On the other hand, some groups work with diverse applications that do not know each other. Mainly inspired by results coming from Social and Human Sciences, we believe that the complete CSCW environment cannot be defined a priori. However, we also believe that a global CSCW environment is really valuable for users. Taking our foundations in the Activity Theory, we aim at creating a global but tailorable environment that supports the dynamic integration of external applications and manages the links between them, i.e. it manages the inter-activities. This work is concretized in the CooLDA platform.

[1]  Rayford B. Vaughn Teaching Industrial Practices in an Undergraduate Software Engineering Course , 2001, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[2]  Philippe Trigano,et al.  CEPIAH, a method for Evaluation and Design of Pedagogical Hypermedia , 2003 .

[3]  Jean-Marc Robert,et al.  How the Web is used to support collaborative writing , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Ivan S. Gibson Group Project Work in Engineering Design—Learning Goals and their Assessment* , 2001 .

[5]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[6]  Timothy Lethbridge,et al.  Priorities for the education and training of software engineers , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[7]  M. Lebrun Des technologies pour enseigner et apprendre , 2007 .

[8]  Jakob Hummes Software components for cooperation : a solution for the "get help" problem , 1998 .

[9]  John C. Grundy,et al.  Developing adaptable user interfaces for component-based systems , 2000, Proceedings First Australasian User Interface Conference. AUIC 2000 (Cat. No.PR00515).

[10]  Armin B. Cremers,et al.  TheEvolve project: Component-based tailorability for CSCW applications , 2000, AI & SOCIETY.

[11]  R.L. Upchurch,et al.  The acquisition of expertise in software engineering education , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[12]  André van der Hoek,et al.  Problems and Programmers: an educational software engineering card game , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Open Ended Group Projects a 'Tool' for More Effective Teaching , 2003, ACE.

[14]  Grégory Bourguin,et al.  Beyond the Interface: Co-evolution Inside Interactive Systems - A Proposal Founded on Activity Theory , 2001, BCS HCI/IHM.

[15]  Srikanth Raju,et al.  An Open Web Services Architecture , 2003, ACM Queue.

[16]  Philippe Perrenoud,et al.  Apprendre à l’école à travers des projets : pourquoi ? comment ? , 2002 .

[17]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[18]  J. Pernin,et al.  Dispositifs d'apprentissage instrumentés par les technologies : vers une ingénierie centrée sur les scénarios , 2004 .

[19]  David Meister,et al.  Performance Measurement : Current Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2006 .