Extending the enterprise evolution contextualisation model

ABSTRACT Enterprise engineering (EE) emerged as a new discipline to encourage comprehensive and consistent enterprise design. Since EE is multidisciplinary, various researchers study enterprises from different perspectives, which resulted in a plethora of applicable literature and terminology, but without shared meaning. Previous research specifically focused on the fragmentation of knowledge for designing and aligning the information and communication technology (ICT) subsystem of the enterprise in order to support the business organisation subsystem of the enterprise. As a solution for this fragmented landscape, a business-IT alignment model (BIAM) was developed inductively from existing business-IT alignment approaches. Since most of the existing alignment frameworks addressed the alignment between the ICT subsystem and the business organisation subsystem, BIAM also focused on the alignment between these two subsystems. Yet, the emerging EE discipline intends to address a broader scope of design, evident in the existing approaches that incorporate a broader scope of design/alignment/governance. A need was identified to address the knowledge fragmentation of the EE knowledge base by adapting BIAM to an enterprise evolution contextualisation model (EECM), to contextualise a broader set of approaches, as identified by Lapalme. The main contribution of this article is the incremental development and evaluation of EECM. We also present guiding indicators/prerequisites for applying EECM as a contextualisation tool.

[1]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research , 2011, TMIS.

[2]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Design of Design: Essays from a Computer Scientist , 2010 .

[3]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[4]  Marne De Vries Using a Classification Schema to Compare Business-IT Alignment Approaches , 2013 .

[5]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[6]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  Enterprise engineering discipline , 1996 .

[7]  Alta van der Merwe,et al.  A framework for the identification of reusable processes , 2013, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Selçuk Sönmez,et al.  Systems Thinking Managing Chaos and Complexity , 2014 .

[9]  John Leaney,et al.  The ABACUS architectural approach to computer-based system and enterprise evolution , 2005, 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'05).

[10]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[11]  Bernard H. Boar,et al.  Constructing Blueprints for Enterprise IT Architectures , 1998 .

[12]  S. Cassels Design in business , 1990 .

[13]  D. R. Towill,et al.  Successful business systems engineering. I. The systems approach to business processes , 1997 .

[14]  James B. Martin The great transition using the seven disciplines of enterprise engineering to align people , 1990 .

[15]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  John Zachman’s Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework , 2010 .

[16]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[17]  Derek K. Hitchins Advanced Systems Thinking, Engineering, and Management , 2003 .

[18]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY , 2015 .

[20]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them? , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[21]  N. J. Kolk Het belang van competenties voor organisatie en individu. , 2000 .

[22]  L. Diamond IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[23]  Joseph Barjis,et al.  Enterprise Modeling and Simulation Within Enterprise Engineering , 2011 .

[24]  James Lapalme,et al.  Three Schools of Thought on Enterprise Architecture , 2012, IT Professional.

[25]  Peter Bernus,et al.  Handbook on Enterprise Architecture , 2010, International Handbooks on Information Systems.

[26]  Olga Levina,et al.  Proposal for Components of Method Design Theories , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[27]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[28]  Mathias Kirchmer ARIS SmartPath — vom Prozessdesign zur Ausführung in mittelständischen Unternehmen , 2005 .

[29]  J. M. Corbett Organisation and environment , 1994 .

[30]  Phillipp Bergmann,et al.  Constructing Blueprints For Enterprise It Architectures , 2016 .

[31]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[32]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: Charting the Territory for Academic Research , 2008, AMCIS.

[33]  John Mingers,et al.  The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[35]  Marne De Vries,et al.  A process reuse identification framework using an alignment model , 2013 .

[36]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[37]  William B. Rouse Embracing the enterprise , 2004 .

[38]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  A framework for sustainable whole systems design , 2012 .

[39]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[40]  Paul Taylor Information Technology and Organisational Transformation , 2006 .

[41]  G. M. Wijers,et al.  Automated Support of Modelling Process: A View Based on Experiments with Expert Information Engineers , 1990, CAiSE.

[42]  Herbert Heinzel,et al.  The value chain operations reference model as a framework to integrate and manage cross-enterprise business processes , 2005 .

[43]  Daniel Minoli Enterprise Architecture Tools , 2008 .

[44]  Jamshid Gharajedaghi,et al.  Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity - A Platform for Designing Business Architecture , 1999 .

[45]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[46]  Wolfram Pietsch,et al.  Business Process Reengineering , 1994, Wirtschaftsinf..

[47]  J. Kotter Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[48]  Hans B. F. Mulder,et al.  The discipline of enterprise engineering , 2013 .

[49]  Leon A. Kappelman A pragmatic Approach to a Highly Effective Enterprise Architecture Program , 2010 .

[50]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering , 2009, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[51]  Edward C. Thomas Enterprise Systems Engineering , 2002 .

[52]  Jerry N. Luftman Competing in the Information Age , 2003 .

[53]  Mark Lemon,et al.  Exploring the design and perceived benefit of sustainable solutions: a review , 2009 .

[54]  Marne De Vires A framework for understanding and comparing enterprise architecture models , 2010 .

[55]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[56]  Jerry N. Luftman Competing in the Information Age: Align in the Sand , 2003 .

[57]  Arquitectura Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology , 2013 .

[58]  T. C. Powell Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[59]  Roel Wagter,et al.  Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work , 2005 .

[60]  Vice President,et al.  ALIGNING ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE AND IT INVESTMENTS WITH CORPORATE GOALS , 2002 .

[61]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[62]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[63]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  An Update on Business-IT Alignment: "A Line" Has Been Drawn , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.