Optimal Decision Rules for Biomarker-Based Subgroup Selection for a Targeted Therapy in Oncology

Throughout recent years, there has been a rapidly increasing interest regarding the evaluation of so-called targeted therapies. These therapies are assumed to show a greater benefit in a pre-specified subgroup of patients—commonly identified by a predictive biomarker—as compared to the total patient population of interest. This situation has led to the necessity to develop biostatistical methods allowing an efficient evaluation of such treatments. Among others, adaptive enrichment designs have been proposed as a solution. These designs allow the selection of the most promising patient population based on an efficacy analysis at interim and restricting recruitment to these patients afterwards. As has recently been shown, the performance of the applied interim decision rule in such a design plays a crucial role in ensuring a successful trial. In this work, we investigate the situation when the primary outcome of the trial is a binary variable. Optimal decision rules are derived which incorporate the uncertainty about the treatment effects. These optimal decision rules are evaluated with respect to their performance in an adaptive enrichment design in terms of correct selection probability and power, and are compared to proposed ad hoc decision rules. Our methods are illustrated by means of a clinical trial example.

[1]  T. Friede,et al.  A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  Designing Issues in Confirmatory Adaptive Population Enrichment Trials , 2015, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics.

[3]  Cyrus Mehta,et al.  Biomarker-driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints. , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  C. Jennison,et al.  An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints † , 2011, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[5]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Adaptive patient enrichment designs in therapeutic trials , 2009, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[6]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Decision Rules for Subgroup Selection Based on a Predictive Biomarker , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[7]  C. Hudis Trastuzumab--mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Performance of Biomarker-Based Subgroup Selection Rules in Adaptive Enrichment Designs , 2016 .

[9]  J. Baselga,et al.  Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (NOAH): follow-up of a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Martin Posch,et al.  Adaptive designs for subpopulation analysis optimizing utility functions , 2014, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[11]  Tim Friede,et al.  Adaptive Designs for Confirmatory Clinical Trials with Subgroup Selection , 2014, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[12]  C. Mehta,et al.  Population Enrichment Designs: Case Study of a Large Multinational Trial , 2011, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[13]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Integrating biomarkers in clinical trials , 2011, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[14]  Cyrus Mehta,et al.  Optimizing Trial Design: Sequential, Adaptive, and Enrichment Strategies , 2009, Circulation.

[15]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Flexible design clinical trial methodology in regulatory applications , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  George Apostolakis,et al.  Decision theory , 1986 .

[18]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset , 2007, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[19]  John Bather,et al.  Decision Theory , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[20]  Y. Hochberg A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[21]  Roger J Lewis,et al.  Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation , 2007, Clinical trials.