Molecular dynamics simulations indicate an induced-fit mechanism for LSD1/CoREST-H3-histone molecular recognition

BackgroundLysine Specific Demethylase (LSD1 or KDM1A) in complex with its co-repressor protein CoREST catalyzes the demethylation of the H3 histone N-terminal tail and is currently one of the most promising epigenetic targets for drug discovery against cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Models of non-covalent binding, such as lock and key, induced-fit, and conformational selection could help explaining the molecular mechanism of LSD1/CoREST-H3-histone association, thus guiding drug discovery and design efforts. Here, we quantify the extent to which LSD1/CoREST substrate binding is consistent with these hypothetical models using LSD1/CoREST conformational ensembles obtained through extensive explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.ResultsWe find that an induced-fit model is the most representative of LSD1/CoREST-H3-histone non-covalent binding and accounts for the local conformational changes occurring in the H3-histone binding site. We also show that conformational selection – despite in principle not ruled out by this finding – is minimal, and only relevant when global properties are considered, e.g. the nanoscale motion of the LSD1/CoREST clamp.ConclusionThe induced-fit mechanism revealed by our MD simulation study will aid the inclusion of protein dynamics for the discovery and design of LSD1 inhibitors targeting the H3-histone binding region. On a general basis, our study indicates the importance of using multiple metrics or selection schemes when testing alternative hypothetical mechanistic models of non-covalent binding.

[1]  R. Ophoff,et al.  Current status and future prospects for epigenetic psychopharmacology , 2012, Epigenetics.

[2]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[3]  Burgen As Conformational changes and drug action. , 1981 .

[4]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Catalytic Mechanism Investigation of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1): A Computational Study , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Brain-penetrant LSD1 inhibitors can block memory consolidation. , 2012, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[6]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Structural basis for CoREST-dependent demethylation of nucleosomes by the human LSD1 histone demethylase. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[7]  G. Fasano,et al.  A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test , 1987 .

[8]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[9]  A. Mclachlan Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[11]  Leo S. D. Caves,et al.  Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .

[12]  Linus Pauling,et al.  "A Theory of the Structure and Process of Formation of Antibodies" (pages 26-32) , 1940 .

[13]  S. Burridge Target watch: Drugging the epigenome , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[15]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[16]  F. Forneris,et al.  Structural Basis of LSD1-CoREST Selectivity in Histone H3 Recognition* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Ferenc Orosz,et al.  From “fluctuation fit” to “conformational selection”: Evolution, rediscovery, and integration of a concept , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Molecular mimicry and ligand recognition in binding and catalysis by the histone demethylase LSD1-CoREST complex. , 2011, Structure.

[19]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Induced‐fit or preexisting equilibrium dynamics? Lessons from protein crystallography and MD simulations on acetylcholinesterase and implications for structure‐based drug design , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  E. Fischer Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .

[21]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Martin Dugas,et al.  Inhibition of the LSD1 (KDM1A) demethylase reactivates the all-trans-retinoic acid differentiation pathway in acute myeloid leukemia , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[23]  X. Daura,et al.  Folding–unfolding thermodynamics of a β‐heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations , 1999, Proteins.

[24]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Accessing a Hidden Conformation of the Maltose Binding Protein Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  H. Bosshard,et al.  Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? , 2001, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[26]  T. Kenakin RECEPTOR CONFORMATIONAL INDUCTION VERSUS SELECTION : ALL PART OF THE SAME ENERGY LANDSCAPE , 1996 .

[27]  F. Forneris,et al.  A Highly Specific Mechanism of Histone H3-K4 Recognition by Histone Demethylase LSD1* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  García,et al.  Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[29]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  Ubiquitin Dynamics in Complexes Reveal Molecular Recognition Mechanisms Beyond Induced Fit and Conformational Selection , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ion-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations , 1990 .

[31]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , 1981 .

[32]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[33]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  C. Bountra,et al.  Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[35]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  A Coupled Equilibrium Shift Mechanism in Calmodulin-Mediated Signal Transduction , 2008, Structure.

[36]  Xavier Daura,et al.  β-Peptides with Different Secondary-Structure Preferences: How Different Are Their Conformational Spaces? , 2002 .

[37]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Riccardo Baron,et al.  LSD1/CoREST is an allosteric nanoscale clamp regulated by H3-histone-tail molecular recognition , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  F. Forneris,et al.  LSD1: oxidative chemistry for multifaceted functions in chromatin regulation. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[40]  Crispin J. Miller,et al.  The histone demethylase KDM1A sustains the oncogenic potential of MLL-AF9 leukemia stem cells. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[41]  Yang Shi,et al.  Histone Demethylation Mediated by the Nuclear Amine Oxidase Homolog LSD1 , 2004, Cell.

[42]  B. Zagrovic,et al.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  M. Nilges,et al.  Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. , 2004, Structure.