Erratum: Strategical incoherence regulates cooperation in social dilemmas on multiplex networks

Cooperation is a very common, yet not fully-understood phenomenon in natural and human systems. The introduction of a network within the population is known to affect the outcome of cooperative dynamics, allowing for the survival of cooperation in adverse scenarios. Recently, the introduction of multiplex networks has yet again modified the expectations for the outcome of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game, compared to the monoplex case. However, much remains unstudied regarding other social dilemmas on multiplex, as well as the unexplored microscopic underpinnings of it. In this paper, we systematically study the evolution of cooperation in all four games in the T − S plane on multiplex. More importantly, we find some remarkable and previously unknown features in the microscopic organization of the strategies, that are responsible for the important differences between cooperative dynamics in monoplex and multiplex. Specifically, we find that in the stationary state, there are individuals that play the same strategy in all layers (coherent) and others that don’t (incoherent). This second group of players is responsible for the surprising fact of a non full-cooperation in the Harmony Game on multiplex, never observed before, as well as a higher-than-expected cooperation rates in some regions of the other three social dilemmas.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Social Network Analysis in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1994 .

[3]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[4]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Self-organization towards optimally interdependent networks by means of coevolution , 2014, ArXiv.

[5]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[6]  R. Axelrod The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[7]  J. Rousseau,et al.  A discourse on inequality , 1984 .

[8]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolution of public cooperation on interdependent networks: The impact of biased utility functions , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  R. Axelrod Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1980 .

[10]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[11]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[13]  Lourdes Araujo,et al.  Social Experiments in the Mesoscale: Humans Playing a Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[15]  C. Hauert,et al.  Via Freedom to Coercion: The Emergence of Costly Punishment , 2007, Science.

[16]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. F. F. Mendes,et al.  Biased imitation in coupled evolutionary games in interdependent networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Conrado J. Pérez Vicente,et al.  Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[19]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[21]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[22]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[23]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Layered complex networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[24]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[25]  A. Licht Games Commissions Play: 2x2 Games of International Securities Regulation , 1997 .

[26]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Complex Cooperative Networks from Evolutionary Preferential Attachment , 2008, PloS one.

[27]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[28]  Angel Sánchez,et al.  A comparative analysis of spatial Prisoner's Dilemma experiments: Conditional cooperation and payoff irrelevance , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[29]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  A. Rapoport Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution , 1974 .

[31]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[32]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[33]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[34]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Growing Networks Driven by the Evolutionary Prisoner’s Dilemma Game , 2012 .

[36]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The logic of asymmetric contests , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  A. Arenas,et al.  Mathematical Formulation of Multilayer Networks , 2013, 1307.4977.

[38]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[39]  Lin Wang,et al.  Degree mixing in multilayer networks impedes the evolution of cooperation , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  How Did Cooperative Behavior Evolve? , 2005, Science.

[41]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  On the dynamical interplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks , 2013, Physical review letters.

[42]  A. Rapoport Prisoner’s Dilemma — Recollections and Observations , 1974 .

[43]  Luis Mario Floría,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation in Multiplex Networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[44]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.