Introducing S-parameters for ultrasound-based structural health monitoring

Scattering parameters (S-parameters) are the most common tools for characterizing microwave devices and high-frequency systems but have not been used for ultrasoundbased structural health monitoring (SHM) so far. In this paper, we present the theory, signal processing algorithms, and experimental results to demonstrate the applications of S-parameters for three common ultrasound-based SHM techniques, i.e., ultrasound pitch-catch, pulse-echo, and impedance/admittance measurements. The concept of the S-parameters is first introduced, followed by the discussions of extracting the time-domain ultrasound signals from the frequency-domain Sparameter measurements. The time-domain signals calculated from the measured S-parameters were compared with the oscilloscope measurements. Excellent agreements between these two sets of measurements were achieved. In addition, time-frequency analysis of the ultrasound inspection system based on the S-parameter measurements has also been performed. This work demonstrated that the S-parameters can serve as a versatile tool for ultrasound-based SHM.

[1]  R. Tkadlec.  S-Parameter Measurements in the Time Domain , 2004 .

[2]  L. Susman,et al.  Comments on "Applications of Time-Domain Metrology to the Automation of Broad-Band Microwave Measurements" [Letters] , 1972 .

[3]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  A comparison of embedded sensor Lamb wave ultrasonic tomography approaches for material loss detection , 2006 .

[4]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Accuracy of frequency domain analysis scenarios for the determination of complex dielectric permittivity , 2004 .

[5]  T. Michaels,et al.  Guided wave signal processing and image fusion for in situ damage localization in plates , 2007 .

[6]  K.A. Remley,et al.  The Sampling Oscilloscope as a Microwave Instrument , 2007, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[7]  Richard C. Heyser.  Loudspeaker Phase Characteristics and Time Delay Distortion: Part 1 , 1969 .

[8]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Structural health monitoring using electro-mechanical impedance sensors , 2008 .

[9]  Christian Boller,et al.  Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures , 2003 .

[10]  C. Rogers,et al.  Modeling of the Electro-Mechanical (E/M) Impedance Response of a Damaged Composite Beam , 1999, Adaptive Structures and Material Systems.

[11]  Yaowen Yang,et al.  Practical issues related to the application of the electromechanical impedance technique in the structural health monitoring of civil structures: I. Experiment , 2008 .

[12]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[13]  Kyung-Young Jhang,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive assessment of micro damage in material: A review , 2009 .

[14]  H. Carlin,et al.  The Scattering Matrix in Network Theory , 1956 .

[15]  W. Van Moer,et al.  NVNA versus LSNA: enemies or friends? , 2010, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[16]  J. Hestenes,et al.  Medical ultrasound imager based on time delay spectrometry. , 1989, Ultrasonics.

[17]  T.J. Brazil.  Accurate and efficient incorporation of frequency-domain data within linear and non-linear time-domain transient simulation , 2005, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005..

[18]  J Jarzynski,et al.  Time-frequency representations of Lamb waves. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Kahrs.  Applications of RF and microwave sampling to instrumentation and measurement , 2003, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2003.

[20]  V. Belevitch,et al.  Elementary Applications of the Scattering Formalism in Network Design , 1956 .

[21]  K. Wear,et al.  Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  L. De Marchi,et al.  Warped-wigner-hough transformation of lamb waves for automatic defect detection , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[23]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Damage detection in composite structures using Lamb wave analysis and time-frequency approach , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[24]  W. L. Gore.  Comparison of Vna and Tdr measuremenT unCerTainTy using Coaxial Cables , .

[25]  Laurence J. Jacobs,et al.  Acoustic Nonlinearity Parameter Due to Microplasticity , 2006 .

[26]  L. Susman,et al.  Applications of Time-Domain Metrology to the Automation of Broad-Band Microwave Measurements , 1972 .

[27]  P. Bloomfield,et al.  Determination of ultrasound hydrophone phase from Fourier-Hilbert transformed 1 to 40 MHz time delay spectrometry amplitude , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[28]  R. Weigel,et al.  Comparison of time domain package characterization techniques using TDR and VNA , 2004, Proceedings of 6th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC 2004) (IEEE Cat. No.04EX971).

[29]  J.L. Rose,et al.  Guided wave nuances for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  L. Bjorno,et al.  Application of time-delay spectrometry for calibration of ultrasonic transducers , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[31]  Philippe Ferrari,et al.  Calibration of a time-domain network analyzer: a new approach , 2000, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[32]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Transient analysis applying S-parameters as operators , 2013, Proceedings of the 2013 9th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME).

[33]  Sung-Jin Song,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation Systems: Models and Measurements , 2007 .