The Visibility of Galactic Bars and Spiral Structure at High Redshifts

We investigate the visibility of galactic bars and spiral structure in the distant universe by artificially redshifting 101 B-band CCD images of local spiral galaxies from the Ohio State University Bright Spiral Galaxy Survey. These local galaxy images represent a much fairer statistical baseline than the galaxy atlas images presented by Frei et al. in 1995, the most commonly used calibration sample for morphological work at high redshifts. Our artificially redshifted images correspond to Hubble Space Telescope I814-band observations of the local galaxy sample seen at z = 0.7, with integration times matching those of both the very deep northern Hubble Deep Field (HDF) data and the much shallower HDF flanking field observations. The expected visibility of galactic bars is probed in two ways: (1) using traditional visual classification and (2) by charting the changing shape of the galaxy distribution in "Hubble space," a quantitative two-parameter description of galactic structure that maps closely onto Hubble's original tuning fork. Both analyses suggest that over two-thirds of strongly barred luminous local spirals (i.e., objects classified as SB in the Third Reference Catalogue) would still be classified as strongly barred at z = 0.7 in the HDF data. Under the same conditions, most weakly barred spirals (classified SAB in the Third Reference Catalogue) would be classified as regular spirals. The corresponding visibility of spiral structure is assessed visually, by comparing luminosity classifications for the artificially redshifted sample with the corresponding luminosity classifications from the Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog. We find that for exposure times similar to that of the HDF, spiral structure should be detectable in most luminous (MB ~ M*) low-inclination spiral galaxies at z = 0.7 in which it is present. However, obvious spiral structure is only detectable in ~30% of comparable galaxies in the HDF flanking field data using the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2. Our study of artificially redshifted local galaxy images suggests that, when viewed at similar resolution, noise level, and redshift-corrected wavelength, barred spirals are less common at z ~ 0.7 than they are at z = 0.0, although more data are needed to definitively rule out the possibility that cosmic variance is responsible for much of this effect.

[1]  J. Greenberg,et al.  New Extragalactic Perspectives in the New South Africa , 1996 .

[2]  University of Cambridge,et al.  The evolution of barred spiral galaxies in the Hubble Deep Fields North and South , 1998 .

[3]  Allan Sandage,et al.  Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies , 1980 .

[4]  N. R. Tanvir,et al.  Galaxy morphology to I = 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996 .

[5]  Michael Fisher,et al.  Leonardo's Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms , 1998 .

[6]  S. Gould 4. The Clam Stripped Bare by Her Naturalists, Even , 1998 .

[7]  Karl Glazebrook,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Imaging of the CFRS and LDSS Redshift Surveys. I. Morphological Properties , 1998 .

[8]  A. Sandage,et al.  The Carnegie atlas of galaxies , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Nilson,et al.  Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies , 1973 .

[10]  D. Hogg,et al.  Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. XIV. Galaxy Morphology in the Hubble Deep Field (North) and Its Flanking Fields to z = 1.2 , 2000, astro-ph/0008051.

[11]  K. Sellgren,et al.  The Frequency of Barred Spiral Galaxies in the Near-Infrared , 1999, astro-ph/9910479.

[12]  M. Livio,et al.  On the Morphology of the HST Faint Galaxies , 1996 .

[13]  Marianne Yasuko Takamiya,et al.  Galaxy Structural Parameters: Star Formation Rate and Evolution with Redshift , 1999 .

[14]  B. Santiago,et al.  The morphological identification of the rapidly evolving population of faint galaxies , 1995, astro-ph/9503101.

[15]  Karl Glazebrook,et al.  The morphologies of distant galaxies. II. Classifications from the Hubble Space Telescope medium deep survey , 1996 .

[16]  G. Lake,et al.  Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Quantifying Morphological Evolution from Low to High Redshifts , 2000, astro-ph/0006166.

[18]  A Preliminary Liminosity Classification for Galaxies of Type Sb. , 1960 .

[19]  S. J. Lilly,et al.  HST imaging of CFRS and LDSS galaxies - I: Morphological Properties , 1997 .

[20]  University of Toronto,et al.  Explorations in Hubble Space: A Quantitative Tuning Fork , 2000, astro-ph/0008415.

[21]  R. Pogge,et al.  Optical and Infrared Images of Galaxies: What’s to be Learned? , 1996 .

[22]  B. Santiago,et al.  The morphology of faint galaxies in Medium Deep Survey images using WFPC2 , 1994 .

[23]  Sidney van den Bergh,et al.  A Preliminary Luminosity Clssification of Late-Type Galaxies. , 1960 .

[24]  Puragra Guhathakurta,et al.  A catalog of digital images of 113 nearby galaxies , 1996 .

[25]  S. van den Bergh,et al.  Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. XV. Classifications of Galaxies with 0.2 < Z < 1.1 in the Hubble Deep Field North and its Flanking Fields , 2001 .