Evaluation of USEPA Method 1622 for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in stream waters

To improve surveillance for Cryptosporidium oocysts in water, the US Environmental Protection Agency developed method 1622, which consists of filtration, concentration, immunomagnetic separation, fluorescent antibody and 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counter-staining, and microscopic evaluation. Two filters were compared for analysis of 11 stream water samples collected throughout the United States. Replicate 10-L stream water samples (unspiked and spiked with 100-250 oocysts) were tested to evaluate matrix effects. Oocyst recoveries from the stream water samples averaged 22% (standard deviation [SD] = ±17%) with a membrane disk and 12% (SD = ±6%) with a capsule filter. Oocyst recoveries from reagent water precision and recovery samples averaged 39% (SD = ±13%) with a membrane disk and 47% (SD = ±19%) with a capsule filter. These results demonstrate that Cryptosporidium oocysts can be recovered from stream waters using method 1622, but recoveries are lower than those from reagent-grade water. This research also evaluated concentrations of indicator bacteria in the stream water samples. Because few samples were oocyst-positive, relationships between detections of oocysts and concentrations of indicator organisms could not be determined.

[1]  D. Cliver,et al.  Immunomagnetic capture PCR to detect viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from environmental samples , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  M. Belosevic,et al.  Comparison of assays for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts viability after chemical disinfection. , 1996, FEMS microbiology letters.

[3]  W. Masschelein,et al.  Effect of disinfection of drinking water with ozone or chlorine dioxide on survival of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  D. Veal,et al.  Viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts exposed to chlorine or other oxidising conditions may lack identifying epitopes. , 1998, International journal for parasitology.

[5]  E. Pozio,et al.  Long-term survival of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in seawater and in experimentally infected mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). , 1999, International journal for parasitology.

[6]  C. Fricker,et al.  Water-borne cryptosporidiosis: detection methods and treatment options. , 1998, Advances in parasitology.

[7]  M. Walker,et al.  Assessment of a dye permeability assay for determination of inactivation rates of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  T. K. Edwards,et al.  Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment , 1998 .

[9]  N. A. Sinclair,et al.  Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  Linda Peterson,et al.  Evaluation of four commercial antibodies , 1999 .

[11]  Ramon G. Lee,et al.  Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in filtered drinking water supplies , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  J. L. Clancy,et al.  Immunomagnetic Separation of Cryptosporidium parvum from Source Water Samples of Various Turbidities , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  J. P. Davis,et al.  A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R. Guerrant,et al.  Protozoal agents: what are the dangers for the public water supply? , 1997, Annual review of medicine.

[15]  L. Perryman,et al.  Infectivity and neutralization of Cryptosporidium parvum sporozoites , 1987, Infection and immunity.

[16]  L. Robertson,et al.  Survival of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under various environmental pressures , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  M. Sobsey,et al.  Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Clostridium perfringens spores by a mixed-oxidant disinfectant and by free chlorine , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.