“This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews

[1]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues , 2006 .

[2]  C. Wilcox.  Rude reviews are pervasive and sometimes harmful, study finds. , 2019, Science.

[3]  Nick J. Sciullo,et al.  Professionalizing Peer Review: Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process , 2019, Journal of Scholarly Publishing.

[4]  Jihua Dong,et al.  Construing Evaluation Through Patterns: Register-specific Variations of the Introductory it Pattern , 2018, Australian Journal of Linguistics.

[5]  C. Tardy.  We Are All Reviewer #2: A Window into the Secret World of Peer Review , 2018, Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication.

[6]  Pejman Habibie,et al.  Novice writers and scholarly publication: Authors, mentors, gatekeepers , 2018 .

[7]  Laura J. Falkenberg,et al.  Reviewing Reviews: An Evaluation of Peer Reviews of Journal Article Submissions , 2018 .

[8]  F. Jiang,et al.  ‘This is because … ’: Authorial practice of (un)attending this in academic prose across disciplines , 2018 .

[9]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  On the Status and Future of Peer Review in Software Engineering , 2017, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Deborah Cox,et al.  Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation , 2018, Scientometrics.

[11]  William Stafford Noble.  Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Brian Paltridge.  The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals , 2017 .

[13]  F. Jiang,et al.  Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance , 2016 .

[14]  Łukasz Grabowski.  Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description , 2015 .

[15]  Janna Rosales,et al.  Beyond deficit: graduate student research-writing pedagogies , 2015 .

[16]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion? , 2015 .

[17]  Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen,et al.  Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar , 2014 .

[18]  Maria R. Shirey.  Building scholarly writing capacity in the doctor of nursing practice program. , 2013, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[19]  Becky Kwan,et al.  Facilitating novice researchers in project publishing during the doctoral years and beyond: a Hong Kong-based study , 2013 .

[20]  Louise Hall,et al.  Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  David Coniam.  Exploring reviewer reactions to manuscripts submitted to academic journals , 2012 .

[22]  Pilar Mur Dueñas.  Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of Finance Spanish scholars' struggles , 2012 .

[23]  Claire Aitchison,et al.  ‘Tough love and tears’: learning doctoral writing in the sciences , 2012 .

[24]  A. Smith,et al.  Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners , 2012 .

[25]  Karen Englander,et al.  Quantifying the Burden of Writing Research Articles in a Second Language , 2011 .

[26]  B. Swanson‐Biearman.  Writing for Publication in Nursing (2Nd Ed.) , 2011 .

[27]  Svenja Adolphs,et al.  Introducing Pragmatics in Use , 2011 .

[28]  Adrian Wallwork,et al.  English for Writing Research Papers , 2011 .

[29]  Gibson Ferguson,et al.  English as an International Language of Scientific Publication: A Study of Attitudes. , 2011 .

[30]  Pauline Webber,et al.  Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments , 2010 .

[31]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic evaluation : review genres in university settings , 2009 .

[32]  Karen Nairn,et al.  Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions, Know-How and Academic Identity , 2009 .

[33]  Inmaculada Fortanet,et al.  Evaluative language in peer review referee reports , 2008 .

[34]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Diane Belcher,et al.  Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world , 2007 .

[36]  Martin Hewings,et al.  An 'important contribution' or 'tiresome reading'? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions , 2007 .

[37]  C. Gross,et al.  Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. , 2006, JAMA.

[38]  Richard Smith,et al.  Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006 .

[39]  Richard Smith,et al.  Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[40]  Mike Scott,et al.  Textual Patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education , 2006 .

[41]  K. Hyland,et al.  Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing , 2005 .

[42]  Kumju Hwang,et al.  The Inferior Science and the Dominant Use of English in Knowledge Production , 2005 .

[43]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse , 2005 .

[44]  T. Ross.  Is It Because... , 2004 .

[45]  S. Schroter,et al.  BMJ training for peer reviewers , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  Frank Davidoff.  Improving peer review: who's responsible? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[47]  Hugh Gosden,et al.  ‘Why not give us the full story?’: functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers , 2003 .

[48]  M. Oermann,et al.  Writing for Publication in Nursing , 2002 .

[49]  G. Leech,et al.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus , 2001 .

[50]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[51]  J. Swales.  Occluded Genres in the Academy , 1996 .

[52]  Johanna Copeland,et al.  an important contribution... , 1979 .

[53]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .

[54]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .