Fracture toughness of thixotropic and room temperature cured epoxy-based adhesives for in situ timber bonding

Abstracts An experimental investigation has been carried out on the fracture toughness of three thixotropic and room temperature cured epoxy-based adhesives formulated specifically for in situ timber bonding namely CB10TSS (standard adhesive), Albipox is a modification of CB10TSS with the addition of nano-dispersed carboxyl-terminated butadiene acrylonitrile (CTBN) and Timberset is a commercially used adhesive formulation containing quartz, mica and bentonite and cured with an aliphatic diamine (TMD). The fracture toughness behaviour of the adhesives was investigated using the Charpy impact test on unnotched specimens conditioned at 20 °C/65%RH and 30 °C/95%RH to observe the effect of temperature and moisture. The Charpy impact tests were also performed on notched specimens to evaluate notch sensitivity, and a single-edge notched beam (SENB) test was performed to evaluate the stress intensity factor, KIC. The fracture surfaces were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Under high impact rate at 20 °C/65%RH, toughness was in the order of CB10TSS, Albino and Timber set. CB10TSS and Albino were found to be ductile in the unmatched state and brittle when notched. After exposure to 30 °C/95%RH, Albino was tougher than CB10TSS due to an increase in ductility, which allowed the rubber particles to cogitate. Timber set was brittle in both unmatched and notched states. Under low strain rate (SENB) conditions the addition of CTBN significantly improved the fracture toughness of Albino compared with CB10TSS and Timber set. Examination of the topography of the fractured surface revealed marked changes in crack propagation due to the addition of nana- or micro-fillers accounting for the variation in toughness properties. The toughness of thixotropic adhesives, specified for bonding in connections in timber structures, could therefore be enhanced by the inclusion in the epoxy matrix of phase separated liquid rubber.

[1]  A. Kinloch,et al.  Hybrid particulate-filled epoxy-polymers , 1984 .

[2]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Examination of the processes of deformation and fracture in a silica-filled epoxy resin , 1990 .

[3]  M. Ansell,et al.  Influence of nanofillers on the thermal and mechanical behavior of DGEBA-based adhesives for bonded-in timber connections , 2006 .

[4]  L. Ye,et al.  Epoxy/Silica Nanocomposites: Nanoparticle‐Induced Cure Kinetics and Microstructure , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas J. Pinnavaia,et al.  Polymer-clay nanocomposites , 2000 .

[6]  K. Oksman,et al.  Mechanical properties and morphology of impact modified polypropylene-wood flour composites , 1998 .

[7]  Z. Stachurski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the cure reaction of DGEBA/DDS epoxy resins without and with thermoplastic polysulfone modifier using near infra-red spectroscopy , 1993 .

[8]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Engineering materials 1: an introduction to their properties and applications , 1996 .

[9]  P. R. Pinnock,et al.  The mechanical properties of solid polymers , 1966 .

[10]  J. Pascault,et al.  Rubber‐modified epoxies. II. Influence of the cure schedule and rubber concentration on the generated morphology , 1991 .

[11]  G. Irwin.  Crack-Toughness Testing of Strain-Rate Sensitive Materials , 1964 .

[12]  J. d’Almeida,et al.  Analysis of the fracture behavior of epoxy resins under impact conditions , 2000 .

[13]  S. Pugh.  The fracture of brittle materials , 1967 .

[14]  S. J. Shaw,et al.  Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber-toughened epoxy: 1. Microstructure and fracture studies , 1983 .

[15]  Lawrence E. Nielsen,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Polymers , 1962 .

[16]  L. Drzal,et al.  The effect of chemical modification on the fracture toughness of montmorillonite clay/epoxy nanocomposites , 2004 .

[17]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Silica nanoparticles filled polypropylene: effects of particle surface treatment, matrix ductility and particle species on mechanical performance of the composites , 2005 .

[18]  C. Gouri,et al.  Carboxyl‐terminated poly(propylene glycol) adipate‐modified room temperature curing epoxy adhesive for elevated temperature service environment , 1991 .

[19]  Albert F. Yee,et al.  Influence of particle size and particle size distribution on toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxies , 1991 .

[20]  Derrick Dean,et al.  S2-Glass/Epoxy Polymer Nanocomposites: Manufacturing, Structures, Thermal and Mechanical Properties , 2003 .

[21]  P. Latha,et al.  Room temperature curing of CTBN-toughened epoxy adhesive with elevated temperature service capability , 1990 .

[22]  T. Scherzer.  Characterization of diol modified epoxy resins by near‐ and mid‐infrared spectroscopy , 1994 .

[23]  M. Tomoi,et al.  Effect of cross-link density on modification of epoxy resins by N-phenylmaleimide-styrene copolymers , 1993 .

[24]  L. Sperling,et al.  Effect of grafting on phase volume fraction, composition, and mechanical behavior: Epoxy/poly (n‐butyl acrylate) simultaneous interpenetrating networks , 1979 .

[25]  R. Landel,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites , 1993 .

[26]  D. G. Smith,et al.  Book reviewEngineering materials: An introduction to their properties and applications: By Michael F. Ashby and David R.H. Jones. Pp. 278. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980. Hard cover £15.00, Flexi cover £4.75 , 1982 .

[27]  K. Mizutani,et al.  Influence of external environments on fatigue crack growth in epoxy resin , 1983 .

[28]  Leslie H. Sperling,et al.  Polymer Blends and Composites , 1995 .