Technology has become the solution to many long-standing problems, and while current technologies may be effective, it is far from fully addressing the hug, complex, difficult and challenging tasks associated with disaster missions and risky intervention. The challenge is in finding creative, reliable and applicable technical solutions in such highly constrained and uncertain environment. In addition, it is necessary to overcome constrains on resources by developing innovative, cost effective and practical technology. Robotics can play important intelligent and technological roles that support first response equipment in harsh and dangerous environments while replacing rescue personnel from entering unreachable or unsafe places. Robotics solutions that are well adapted to local conditions of unstructured and unknown environment can greatly improve safety and security of personnel as well as work efficiency, productivity and flexibility. Solving and fulfilling the needs of such tasks presents challenges in robotic mechanical structure and mobility, sensors and sensor fusion, autonomous and semi autonomous control, planning and navigation, and machine intelligence. This paper categorizes the source of disasters and associated missions, and highlights the needs for suitable and reliable technology and technical and functional requirements of robotic systems to fulfill task objectives. In addition, it shows that robotic technologies can be used for disasters prevention or early warning, intervention and recovery efforts during disasters with all possible kinds of relevant missions while ensuring quality of service and safety of human beings. Some of these missions may include: demining, search and rescue, surveillance, reconnaissance and risk assessment, evacuation assistance, intrusion/victim detection and assessment, etc.
[1]
G. M. Spinks,et al.
Fast bender actuators for fish-like aquatic robots
,
2008,
SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.
[2]
P. Helm,et al.
Integrated risk management for natural and technological disasters
,
1996
.
[3]
M.K. Habib,et al.
Humanitarian demining: Difficulties, needs and the prospect of technology
,
2008,
2008 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.
[4]
Tony Waters,et al.
Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster
,
1997
.
[5]
Y. BAUDOIN,et al.
VIEW-FINDER : EUROPEAN PROJECT AIMING CRISIS MANAGEMENT TOOLS AND THE ROBOTICS ASSISTANCE TO FIRE-FIGHTING SERVICES
,
2009
.
[6]
Maki K. Habib,et al.
Service Robots and Humanitarian Demining
,
2006
.
[7]
Byungkyu Kim,et al.
A biomimetic undulatory tadpole robot using ionic polymer–metal composite actuators
,
2005
.
[8]
Maki K. Habib,et al.
Humanitarian Demining: Reality and the Challenge of Technology – The State of the Arts
,
2007
.
[9]
Phil Stenchion,et al.
Development and Disaster Management
,
1997
.
[10]
Ilan Noy,et al.
NATURAL DISASTERS
,
2011
.