Interaction of Waves with Frictional Interfaces Using Summation-by-Parts Difference Operators: Weak Enforcement of Nonlinear Boundary Conditions

We present a high-order difference method for problems in elastodynamics involving the interaction of waves with highly nonlinear frictional interfaces. We restrict our attention to two-dimensional antiplane problems involving deformation in only one direction. Jump conditions that relate tractions on the interface, or fault, to the relative sliding velocity across it are of a form closely related to those used in earthquake rupture models and other frictional sliding problems. By using summation-by-parts (SBP) finite difference operators and weak enforcement of boundary and interface conditions, a strictly stable method is developed. Furthermore, it is shown that unless the nonlinear interface conditions are formulated in terms of characteristic variables, as opposed to the physical variables in terms of which they are more naturally stated, the semi-discretized system of equations can become extremely stiff, preventing efficient solution using explicit time integrators.The use of SBP operators also provides a rigorously defined energy balance for the discretized problem that, as the mesh is refined, approaches the exact energy balance in the continuous problem. This enables one to investigate earthquake energetics, for example the efficiency with which elastic strain energy released during rupture is converted to radiated energy carried by seismic waves, rather than dissipated by frictional sliding of the fault. These theoretical results are confirmed by several numerical tests in both one and two dimensions demonstrating the computational efficiency, the high-order convergence rate of the method, the benefits of using strictly stable numerical methods for long time integration, and the accuracy of the energy balance.

[1]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic faulting under rate-dependent friction , 1994 .

[2]  V. V. Kostrov,et al.  AND SEISMIC FLOW OF ROCK , 1974 .

[3]  W.,et al.  Time Dependent Boundary Conditions for Hyperbolic Systems , 2003 .

[4]  H. Kreiss,et al.  Time-Dependent Problems and Difference Methods , 1996 .

[5]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy , 1999 .

[6]  K. Thompson Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II , 1990 .

[7]  E. Dunham,et al.  Earthquake Ruptures with Strongly Rate-Weakening Friction and Off-Fault Plasticity, Part 1: Planar Faults , 2011 .

[8]  B. Strand Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx , 1994 .

[9]  J. Oliger,et al.  Theoretical and practical aspects of some initial-boundary value problems in fluid dynamics , 1976 .

[10]  H. Kreiss,et al.  Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods for Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations , 1974 .

[11]  P. Olsson Summation by parts, projections, and stability. II , 1995 .

[12]  Gunilla Kreiss,et al.  Perfectly Matched Layers for Hyperbolic Systems: General Formulation, Well-posedness, and Stability , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[13]  J. Rice,et al.  Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids , 2001 .

[14]  J. Rice Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[15]  L. Freund,et al.  On energy radiation from seismic sources , 1981 .

[16]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, far-field boundary conditions , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Ken Mattsson,et al.  Boundary Procedures for Summation-by-Parts Operators , 2003, J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  J. Nordström,et al.  Summation by Parts Operators for Finite Difference Approximations of Second-Derivatives with Variable Coefficients , 2004, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[19]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  On the order of accuracy for difference approximations of initial-boundary value problems , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  Jan Nordström,et al.  Finite volume methods, unstructured meshes and strict stability for hyperbolic problems , 2003 .

[21]  Jan Nordström,et al.  Conservative Finite Difference Formulations, Variable Coefficients, Energy Estimates and Artificial Dissipation , 2006, J. Sci. Comput..

[22]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes , 1994 .

[23]  Jan Nordström,et al.  High Order Finite Difference Approximations of Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Close to Material Discontinuities , 2003, J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Jan Nordström,et al.  High-order finite difference methods, multidimensional linear problems, and curvilinear coordinates , 2001 .

[25]  L. E. Malvern Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[26]  B. Gustafsson The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems , 1975 .

[27]  Dan Givoli,et al.  High-order local absorbing conditions for the wave equation: Extensions and improvements , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[29]  H. Kreiss Initial boundary value problems for hyperbolic systems , 1970 .

[30]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dynamic Fracture Mechanics , 1990 .

[31]  Jeremy E. Kozdon,et al.  Earthquake Ruptures with Strongly Rate-Weakening Friction and Off-Fault Plasticity : 2 . Nonplanar Faults , 2010 .

[32]  Jan Nordstr ERROR BOUNDED SCHEMES FOR TIME-DEPENDENT HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS ∗ , 2007 .

[33]  Olsson,et al.  SUMMATION BY PARTS, PROJECTIONS, AND STABILITY. I , 2010 .

[34]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Stable Boundary Treatment for the Wave Equation on Second-Order Form , 2009, J. Sci. Comput..

[35]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Fourth-order 2N-storage Runge-Kutta schemes , 1994 .

[36]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation. , 2005 .

[37]  J. Rice,et al.  A spectral method for three-dimensional elastodynamic fracture problems , 1995 .