Exploring the complexities of value creation: The role of engagement strength

Abstract Regulatory engagement theory (Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review , 113 , 439–460; Higgins, E.T. & Scholer, A.A. (2009). Engaging the consumer: The science and art of the value creation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology ) proposes that engagement strength plays a critical role in the creation of value intensity. We discuss the ways in which engagement, in this model, can be distinguished from arousal, motivation to act, and experienced difficulty. We distinguish between the mechanisms and predictions made by regulatory engagement theory versus cognitive dissonance theory and a goal systems approach. We also describe the complexities and conditions under which some sources of engagement strength (e.g., regulatory fit) may relate to value creation. For instance, while regulatory fit has more typically been associated with increased engagement strength, regulatory nonfit may also sometimes increase engagement by serving as an obstacle to be overcome. We review existing evidence and highlight open questions related to the role of engagement strength in creating value.

[1]  Angela Y. Lee.  Engaging the consumer: The opposing forces of regulatory nonfit versus fit , 2009 .

[2]  Michel Tuan Pham.  The Logic of Feeling , 2004 .

[3]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  A theory of goal systems. , 2002 .

[4]  G. Clore,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1996 .

[5]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[6]  Ayelet Fishbach.  The function of value in self-regulation , 2009 .

[7]  Michaela Wänke.  The Persuasive Power of Regulatory Fit , 2008 .

[8]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior , 2008 .

[9]  E Tory Higgins,et al.  How “Fun/Importance” Fit Affects Performance: Relating Implicit Theories to Instructions , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Abigail A. Scholer,et al.  Engaging the Consumer: The Science and Art of the Value Creation Process , 2009 .

[11]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[12]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Be Fit and Be Strong: Mastering Self‐Regulation through Regulatory Fit , 2008 .

[13]  J. Förster.  Knowing your customer better: the strengths of a self-regulatory value approach , 2009 .

[14]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Rethinking Regulatory Engagement Theory , 2009 .

[15]  H. Aarts,et al.  Positive affect as implicit motivator: on the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  The social psychology of consumer behaviour , 2002 .

[17]  J. Coull.  Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Jing Wang,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction , 2006 .

[20]  Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998 .

[21]  W. Mischel,et al.  When Asking “Why” Does Not Hurt Distinguishing Rumination From Reflective Processing of Negative Emotions , 2005, Psychological science.