Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND The success of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has varied. The objective of this study was to determine quantitatively and qualitatively the topography and osseous landmarks of the femoral footprints of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament, to improve surgical reconstruction. METHODS Twenty unpaired knees from twenty human cadavers were evaluated. The surface features of the femoral footprints of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament were studied by means of macroscopic observation and three-dimensional laser photography. RESULTS We observed, both visually and with three-dimensional laser photography, an osseous prominence located proximal to the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament in eighteen of the twenty human knees. This osseous landmark, denominated the "medial intercondylar ridge," determined the proximal border of the posterior cruciate ligament footprint. In eight of the twenty knees, we observed a small osseous prominence between the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. A clear change in the slope of the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament was observed between the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. The average area of the posterior cruciate ligament footprint (and standard deviation) was 209 +/- 33.82 mm2, the average area of the anterolateral bundle was 118 +/- 23.95 mm2, and the average area of the posteromedial bundle was 90 +/- 16.13 mm2. CONCLUSIONS The femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament has a unique surface anatomy, consisting of a medial intercondylar ridge and a medial bifurcate ridge. The medial intercondylar ridge is observed more frequently.

[1]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Masaaki Takahashi,et al.  Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[3]  K. Markolf,et al.  Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  R. Parker,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Single- and Double-Bundle Tibial Inlay Techniques , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  P. Mariani,et al.  Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. An anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review. , 2003, The Knee.

[6]  V. Mow,et al.  Codominance of the Individual Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles: An Analysis of Bundle Lengths and Orientation , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  F. Noyes,et al.  Two-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  S L Woo,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction* , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  S. Woo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  W. Clancy,et al.  Combined posterior cruciate ligament injuries. , 1994, Clinics in sports medicine.

[11]  K.,et al.  Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  H. Pavlov,et al.  Natural history of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  E. Grood,et al.  Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  A. Amis,et al.  PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 'isometric' versus single and double-bundled 'anatomic' grafts. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.