Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDSerious lapses in patient care result from failure to follow-up test results.OBJECTIVETo systematically review evidence quantifying the extent of failure to follow-up test results and the impact for ambulatory patients.DATA SOURCESMedline, CINAHL, Embase, Inspec and the Cochrane Database were searched for English-language literature from 1995 to 2010.STUDY SELECTIONStudies which provided documented quantitative evidence of the number of tests not followed up for patients attending ambulatory settings including: outpatient clinics, academic medical or community health centres, or primary care practices.DATA EXTRACTIONFour reviewers independently screened 768 articles.RESULTSNineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and reported wide variation in the extent of tests not followed-up: 6.8% (79/1163) to 62% (125/202) for laboratory tests; 1.0% (4/395) to 35.7% (45/126) for radiology. The impact on patient outcomes included missed cancer diagnoses. Test management practices varied between settings with many individuals involved in the process. There were few guidelines regarding responsibility for patient notification and follow-up. Quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of electronic test management systems was limited although there was a general trend towards improved test follow-up when electronic systems were used.LIMITATIONSMost studies used medical record reviews; hence evidence of follow-up action relied upon documentation in the medical record. All studies were conducted in the US so care should be taken in generalising findings to other countries.CONCLUSIONSFailure to follow-up test results is an important safety concern which requires urgent attention. Solutions should be multifaceted and include: policies relating to responsibility, timing and process of notification; integrated information and communication technologies facilitating communication; and consideration of the multidisciplinary nature of the process and the role of the patient. It is essential that evaluations of interventions are undertaken and solutions integrated into the work and context of ambulatory care delivery.

[1]  Alvin I Mushlin,et al.  Glucose testing and insufficient follow-up of abnormal results: a cohort study , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  D Parker,et al.  Psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in health care , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[4]  Marlene R. Miller,et al.  Advancing the Science of Patient Safety , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  N. Elder,et al.  Crossing the finish line: follow-up of abnormal test results in a multisite community health center. , 2010, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[6]  David W Bates,et al.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  L. Berlin.  Malpractice and radiologists. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  C. Marn,et al.  Efficiency of a semiautomated coding and review process for notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Monica Lahra,et al.  The quality of communication between hospitals and general practitioners: an assessment. , 1998, Journal of quality in clinical practice.

[11]  E. Halm,et al.  Factors Associated with Time to Follow-up of Severe Hyperkalemia in the Ambulatory Setting , 2007, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[12]  E. Kilpatrick,et al.  Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective audit , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  G. Regehr,et al.  Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence: Novice Physicians Who Are Unskilled and Unaware of It , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[16]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  E. Halm,et al.  Follow-up of Markedly Elevated Serum Potassium Results in the Ambulatory Setting: Implications for Patient Safety , 2006, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[18]  P. Cram,et al.  The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system , 2007, BMC family practice.

[19]  Jennie J Gallimore,et al.  Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices , 2009, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[20]  T. Brennan,et al.  Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  John Hickner,et al.  The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems, Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff: A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network , 2006 .

[22]  David W Bates,et al.  An evaluation of the adequacy of outpatient monitoring of thyroid replacement therapy. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  J. Bond,et al.  Evaluating Follow‐Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results: Lessons Learned , 2007, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[25]  Leonard Berlin.  Malpractice issues in radiology: res ipsa loquitur. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  T. Caeiro,et al.  [Error in medicine]. , 2004, Medicina.

[27]  Meza Jp,et al.  Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. , 2000 .

[28]  Kevin J O'Leary,et al.  Creating a better discharge summary: improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. , 2009, Journal of hospital medicine.

[29]  Lisa V Rubenstein,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Importance of Follow-Up , 2006, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[30]  Ray Burke,et al.  Opportunistic screening for diabetes in routine clinical practice. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[31]  H. Hammerman.  Communicating imaging results to patients: OnSite results. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  John Hickner,et al.  Quality and safety in outpatient laboratory testing. , 2008, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[33]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Sharing Electronic Laboratory Results in a Patient Portal - a Feasibility Pilot , 2007, MedInfo.

[34]  Robert M Wachter,et al.  Why diagnostic errors don't get any respect--and what can be done about them. , 2010, Health affairs.

[35]  J. Meza,et al.  Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. , 2000, The American journal of managed care.

[36]  Joanne L. Callen,et al.  Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[38]  Robert A McNutt,et al.  Missed hypothyroidism diagnosis uncovered by linking laboratory and pharmacy data. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[39]  David W. Bates,et al.  Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[40]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Patients as actors: The patient's role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  Robert B Wallace,et al.  Failure to recognize and act on abnormal test results: the case of screening bone densitometry. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[42]  Elisabeth Burdick,et al.  Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[43]  David W. Bates,et al.  Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[44]  Peter C. Austin,et al.  Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[45]  M. Laposata,et al.  Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[46]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Research Paper: Communication Outcomes of Critical Imaging Results in a Computerized Notification System , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[47]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[48]  D. Bates,et al.  What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. , 2002, JAMA.

[49]  Kenneth D Mandl,et al.  Notifying Emergency Department Patients of Negative Test Results: Pitfalls of Passive Communication , 2003, Pediatric emergency care.

[50]  B. McCarthy,et al.  Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[51]  Urmimala Sarkar,et al.  Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[52]  M. Graber.  The physician and the laboratory: Partners in reducing diagnostic error related to laboratory testing: , 2006 .

[53]  I Kohane,et al.  Potential impact of a computerized system to report late-arriving laboratory results in the emergency department , 2000, Pediatric emergency care.

[54]  S. Dovey,et al.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[55]  Leonard Berlin,et al.  Communicating results of all outpatient radiologic examinations directly to patients: the time has come. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Interpretative commenting: a tool for improving the laboratory-clinical interface. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[57]  D. Bates.  Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  S. Saint,et al.  Fumbled Handoffs: One Dropped Ball after Another Improving Patient Care , 2005 .

[59]  D. Bates.  Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. , 2005, Health affairs.

[60]  J Callen,et al.  The Rate of Missed Test Results in an Emergency Department , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[61]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[62]  Marc Berg,et al.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[63]  R. Kessels,et al.  Patients’ Memory for Medical Information , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[64]  J. Wisnivesky,et al.  Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[65]  Bruce Koehler,et al.  E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results? , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[66]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[67]  E. Potchen,et al.  Mammography and malpractice. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[68]  M. Graber,et al.  Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[69]  P Ley,et al.  Memory for medical information. , 1979, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[70]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[71]  David Edelman,et al.  Outpatient diagnostic errors: unrecognized hyperglycemia. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[72]  John Flach,et al.  The management of test results in primary care: does an electronic medical record make a difference? , 2010, Family medicine.

[73]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Model Formulation: Contextual Implementation Model: A Framework for Assisting Clinical Information System Implementations , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[74]  Christopher L. Roy,et al.  Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital Discharge , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[75]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial , 2011, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[76]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[77]  Leonard Berlin,et al.  Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come? , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.