Initial clinical experience of synthetic MRI as a routine neuroimaging protocol in daily practice: A single-center study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We investigated the clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI with a 4-min single scan using a 48-channel head coil as a routine neuroimaging protocol in daily practice by assessing its diagnostic image quality. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 89 patients who underwent routine brain MRI using synthetic MRI acquisition between February 2017 and April 2017. Image quality assessments were performed by two independent readers on synthetic T1 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted, T2 FLAIR, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences acquired using multiple-dynamic multiple-echo imaging. Interobserver reliability between the two readers was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics. RESULTS On a 4-point assessment scale, the overall image quality and anatomical delineation provided by synthetic brain MRI were found to be good with scores of more than 3 points for all sequences except for the T2 FLAIR sequence. The synthetic T2 FLAIR sequence provided sufficient image quality but showed more pronounced artifacts, especially the CSF pulsation artifact and linear hyperintensity along the brain surface. Interobserver agreement for evaluating image quality of all synthetic sequences was good to excellent (κ, 0.61-0.99; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Synthetic MRI can be acceptable as a routine clinical neuroimaging protocol with a short scan time. It can be helpful to design customized and flexible neuroimaging protocols for each institution.

[1]  P Aspelin,et al.  Clinical Feasibility of Synthetic MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: A Diagnostic and Volumetric Validation Study , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  K. Hasan,et al.  Phase-sensitive T1 inversion recovery imaging: a time-efficient interleaved technique for improved tissue contrast in neuroimaging. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  J N Lee,et al.  Cerebral magnetic resonance image synthesis. , 1985, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  T. Naidich,et al.  Synthetic MRI for Clinical Neuroimaging: Results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Prospective, Multicenter, Multireader Trial , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Young Hun Choi,et al.  Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children , 2017, Pediatric Radiology.

[6]  N. Hattori,et al.  Improving the Quality of Synthetic FLAIR Images with Deep Learning Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Pixel-by-Pixel Image Translation , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  S. Aoki,et al.  Automated brain tissue and myelin volumetry based on quantitative MR imaging with various in-plane resolutions. , 2017, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[9]  O Smedby,et al.  Synthetic Mri of the Brain in a Clinical Setting , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[10]  J N Lee,et al.  Automated MR image synthesis: feasibility studies. , 1984, Radiology.

[11]  J. Duerk,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting , 2013, Nature.

[12]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: Optimization for clinical usage , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Vikas Gulani,et al.  Towards a Single-Sequence Neurologic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination: Multiple-Contrast Images From an IR TrueFISP Experiment , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[14]  O. Abe,et al.  Effect of Gadolinium on the Estimation of Myelin and Brain Tissue Volumes Based on Quantitative Synthetic MRI , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  E Petterson,et al.  Evaluation of Automatic Measurement of the Intracranial Volume Based on Quantitative MR Imaging , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment , 2016, Neuroradiology.