Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size

The results of two experiments are reported that examined how performance in a simple interceptive action (hitting a moving target) was influenced by the speed of the target, the size of the intercepting effector and the distance moved to make the interception. In Experiment 1, target speed and the width of the intercepting manipulandum (bat) were varied. The hypothesis that people make briefer movements, when the temporal accuracy and precision demands of the task are high, predicts that bat width and target speed will divisively interact in their effect on movement time (MT) and that shorter MTs will be associated with a smaller temporal variable error (VE). An alternative hypothesis that people initiate movement when the rate of expansion (ROE) of the target’s image reaches a specific, fixed criterion value predicts that bat width will have no effect on MT. The results supported the first hypothesis: a statistically reliable interaction of the predicted form was obtained and the temporal VE was smaller for briefer movements. In Experiment 2, distance to move and target speed were varied. MT increased in direct proportion to distance and there was a divisive interaction between distance and speed; as in Experiment 1, temporal VE was smaller for briefer movements. The pattern of results could not be explained by the strategy of initiating movement at a fixed value of the ROE or at a fixed value of any other perceptual variable potentially available for initiating movement. It is argued that the results support pre-programming of MT with movement initiated when the target’s time to arrival at the interception location reaches a criterion value that is matched to the pre-programmed MT. The data supported completely open-loop control when MT was less than between 200 and 240 ms with corrective sub-movements increasingly frequent for movements of longer duration.

[1]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in timing the punch of a falling ball , 2001 .

[2]  Russell Fish,et al.  Keep your eye on the ball , 1989, SIFN.

[3]  N Teasdale,et al.  Target speed alone influences the latency and temporal accuracy of interceptive action. , 1998, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Pentylenetetrazol kindling and factors of glutamate transmitter metabolism in rat hippocampus , 1992, Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Jeroen B. J. Smeets,et al.  Multiple information sources in interceptive timing , 1997 .

[7]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Systematic Variation in Performance of an Interceptive Action with Changes in the Temporal Constraints , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: a globally optimal algorithm , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  David N. Lee Guiding Movement by Coupling Taus , 1998 .

[10]  M. Laurent,et al.  Perception-action coupling in an interceptive task: First-order time-to-contact as an input variable , 2000 .

[11]  E. Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  T. Milner,et al.  A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision , 1992, Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Tresilian Hitting a moving target: Perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R. Bootsma,et al.  On the information-based regulation of movement: What Wann (1996) may want to consider , 1997 .

[16]  J. van der Kamp,et al.  Catching optical information for the regulation of timing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[18]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  L Proteau,et al.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  Phillip J. Bairstow,et al.  Analysis of hand movement to moving targets , 1987 .

[22]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[23]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving targets , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  G. Montagne,et al.  The control and coordination of one-handed catching: the effect of temporal constraints , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[27]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Keep Your Eye on the Ball: The Science and Folklore of Baseball , 1990 .

[28]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Martin S. Moran,et al.  A Test of Fitts' Law with Moving Targets , 1980, Human factors.

[30]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[32]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Simone R. Caljouw,et al.  A dynamical neural network for hitting an approaching object , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Manual interception of moving targets II. On-line control of overlapping submovements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  R. Schmidt Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  E Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving objects. The dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[37]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  James L. Breen What Makes a Good Hitter , 1967 .

[39]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[40]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Manual interception of moving targets I. Performance and movement initiation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  P J Beek,et al.  Modelling the control of interceptive actions. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  Frank T. J. M. Zaal,et al.  Dynamics of reaching for stationary and moving objects: Data and Model , 1999 .

[44]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[45]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[46]  R. Gellman,et al.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Rob Gray,et al.  Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial, not temporal cues drive predictive orienting movements during navigation: a virtual reality study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[49]  Marion A. Eppler,et al.  Development of Visually Guided Locomotion , 1998 .