Carotid intima-medial thickness measured on multiple ultrasound frames: evaluation of a DICOM-based software system

BackgroundCarotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measured by B-mode ultrasonography is a marker of atherosclerosis and is commonly used as an outcome in intervention trials. We have developed DICOM-based software that measures CIMT rapidly on multiple end-diastolic image frames. The aims of this study were to compare the performance of our new software with older bitmap-based CIMT measurement software and to determine whether a ten-fold increase in the number of measurements used to calculate mean CIMT would improve reproducibility.MethodsTwo independent sonographers recorded replicate carotid scans in thirty volunteers and two blinded observers measured CIMT off-line using the new DICOM-based software and older bitmap-based software. A Bland-Altman plot was used to compare CIMT results from the two software programs and t-tests were used to compare analysis times. F-tests were used to compare the co-efficients of variation (CVs) from a standard six-frame measurement protocol with CVs from a sixty-frame measurement protocol. Ordinary least products (OLP) regression was used to test for sonographer and observer biases.ResultsThe new DICOM-based software was much faster than older bitmap-based software (average measurement time for one scan 3.4 ± 0.6 minutes versus 8.4 ± 1.8 minutes, p < 0.0001) but CIMT measurements were larger than those made using the alternative software (+0.02 mm, 95%CI 0.01–0.03 mm). The sixty-frame measurement protocol had worse reproducibility than the six-frame protocol (inter-observer CV 5.1% vs 3.5%, p = 0.004) and inter and intra-observer biases were more pronounced in the sixty-frame than the six-frame results.ConclusionWhile the use of DICOM-based software significantly reduced analysis time, a ten-fold increase in the number of measurements used to calculate CIMT did not improve reproducibility. In addition, we found that observer biases caused differences in mean CIMT of a magnitude commonly reported as significant in intervention trials. Our results highlight the importance of good study design with concurrent controls and the need to ensure that no observer drift occurs between baseline and follow-up measurements when CIMT is used to monitor the effect of an intervention.

[1]  C. Furberg,et al.  Multicenter isradipine diuretic atherosclerosis study (MIDAS). Design features. The Midas Research Group. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  O H Førde,et al.  The Tromsø Study. Distribution and population determinants of gamma-glutamyltransferase. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  M. Bond,et al.  Interventional Clinical Trials Using Noninvasive Ultrasound End Points: The Multicenter Isradipine/Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study , 1990, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[4]  J. Salonen,et al.  Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography: inter- and intra-observer variability. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  T Gustavsson,et al.  Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: fundamental principles and description of a computerized analysing system. , 1991, Clinical physiology.

[6]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Measurement Variability in Duplex Scan Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerosis , 1992, Stroke.

[7]  G. Berglund,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of atherosclerotic lesions. Reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurement of arterial wall thickness and plaque size. , 1992, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[8]  Rationale and design for the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study (ACAPS). The ACAPS Group. , 1992, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  P. Touboul,et al.  Use of monitoring software to improve the measurement of carotid wall thickness by B-mode imaging , 1992, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[10]  R W Barnes,et al.  Reproducibility of Noninvasive Ultrasonic Measurement of Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study , 1992, Stroke.

[11]  N. Borhani,et al.  Calcium antagonists and atherosclerosis. The Multicenter Isradipine/Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study. , 1993, American journal of hypertension.

[12]  D. Walsh.  Noninvasive quantification of atherosclerotic lesions: Persson J, Stavenow L, Wilkstrand J, Israelsson B, Formgren J, Berglund G. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12: 261–266 , 1993 .

[13]  A. Simon,et al.  Evidence for in vivo carotid and femoral wall thickening in human hypertension. Groupe de Prévention Cardio-vasculaire en Médecine du Travail. , 1993, Hypertension.

[14]  W. Mack,et al.  Beneficial Effects of Colestipol‐Niacin Therapy on the Common Carotid Artery. Two‐ and Four‐Year Reduction of Intima‐Media Thickness Measured by Ultrasound , 1993, Circulation.

[15]  R H Selzer,et al.  Evaluation of computerized edge tracking for quantifying intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from B-mode ultrasound images. , 1994, Atherosclerosis.

[16]  A. Hofman,et al.  Reproducibility of carotid vessel wall thickness measurements. The Rotterdam Study. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  J. Werba,et al.  Common Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness Measurement: A Method to Improve Accuracy and Precision , 1994, Stroke.

[18]  A. Keech,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness is only weakly correlated with the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[19]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. , 1995, Stroke.

[20]  O. Wiklund,et al.  On quantifying plaque size and intima-media thickness in carotid and femoral arteries. Comments on results from a prospective ultrasound study in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. , 1996, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[21]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Relation of intima-media thickness to atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries. The Vascular Aging (EVA) Study. , 1996, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[22]  C. Furberg,et al.  Reliability of longitudinal ultrasonographic measurements of carotid intimal-medial thicknesses. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Progression Study Research Group. , 1996, Stroke.

[23]  A. Algra,et al.  Reproducibility of in vivo carotid intima-media thickness measurements: a review. , 1997, Stroke.

[24]  J. Ludbrook.  SPECIAL ARTICLE COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT , 1997 .

[25]  J Ludbrook,et al.  Comparing methods of measurements. , 1997, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[26]  M. Schachter.  Calcium antagonists and atherosclerosis. , 1997, International journal of cardiology.

[27]  T Gustavsson,et al.  A new automated computerized analyzing system simplifies readings and reduces the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness. , 1997, Stroke.

[28]  Arno W. Hoes,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. , 1997, Circulation.

[29]  O. Joakimsen,et al.  Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness. The Tromsø Study. , 1997, Stroke.

[30]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima—media thickness in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[31]  C. Sylvén,et al.  Potential of carotid ultrasonography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a comparison with exercise test and variance ECG. , 1998, Stroke.

[32]  A. Dart,et al.  Non-invasive measurements of arterial structure and function: repeatability, interrelationships and trial sample size. , 1998, Clinical science.

[33]  R H Selzer,et al.  The Role of Carotid Arterial Intima-Media Thickness in Predicting Clinical Coronary Events , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  J. Beilby,et al.  Hyperhomocysteinemia but not the C677T mutation of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase is an independent risk determinant of carotid wall thickening. The Perth Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment Study (CUDAS) , 1999, Circulation.

[36]  C. Sirtori,et al.  Reproducibility validation study comparing analog and digital imaging technologies for the measurement of intima-media thickness. , 2000, Stroke.

[37]  Eary,et al.  CAROTID-ARTERY INTIMA AND MEDIA THICKNESS AS A RISK FACTOR FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND STROKE IN OLDER ADULTS , 2000 .

[38]  R H Selzer,et al.  Improved common carotid elasticity and intima-media thickness measurements from computer analysis of sequential ultrasound frames. , 2001, Atherosclerosis.

[39]  E. Mannarino,et al.  Optimizing assessment of carotid and femoral intima-media thickness in essential hypertension. , 2000, American journal of hypertension.

[40]  T. Marwick,et al.  Does renal failure cause an atherosclerotic milieu in patients with end-stage renal disease? , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[41]  J. Beilby,et al.  Antioxidant vitamins and the risk of carotid atherosclerosis. The Perth Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment study (CUDAS). , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  John Ludbrook,et al.  Statistical Techniques For Comparing Measurers And Methods Of Measurement: A Critical Review , 2002, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[43]  L. Bouter,et al.  Plasma homocysteine and S-adenosylmethionine in erythrocytes as determinants of carotid intima-media thickness: different effects in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. The Hoorn Study. , 2003, Atherosclerosis.

[44]  D. Grobbee,et al.  The Osteoporosis Prevention and Arterial effects of tiboLone (OPAL) study: design and baseline characteristics. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[45]  M. Bots,et al.  Aortic stiffness and carotid intima‐media thickness: two independent markers of subclinical vascular damage in young adults? , 2003, European journal of clinical investigation.

[46]  T. Laitinen,et al.  Cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and carotid artery intima-media thickness in adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. , 2003, JAMA.

[47]  Diederick E Grobbee,et al.  Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Intervention Studies: Design Options, Progression Rates, and Sample Size Considerations: A Point of View , 2003, Stroke.

[48]  T. Marwick,et al.  The relative importance of vascular structure and function in predicting cardiovascular events. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  Michiel L. Bots,et al.  Intima Media Thickness as a Surrogate Marker for Generalised Atherosclerosis , 2002, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[50]  M. Akishita,et al.  Interrelationship between non-invasive measurements of atherosclerosis: flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery, carotid intima-media thickness and pulse wave velocity. , 2004, Atherosclerosis.

[51]  H. Markus,et al.  Rates and Determinants of Site-Specific Progression of Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness: The Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study , 2004, Stroke.

[52]  G. Mancia,et al.  Quality control of B-mode ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima–media thickness: the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis , 2005, Journal of hypertension.

[53]  O. Raitakari,et al.  Evaluating the use of a portable ultrasound machine to quantify intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilation: agreement between measurements from two ultrasound machines. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[54]  P. Galan,et al.  Homocysteine is not associated with arterial thickness and stiffness in healthy middle-aged French volunteers. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[55]  Yoshihiro Mukuta,et al.  Evaluation of a new carotid intima-media thickness measurement by B-mode ultrasonography using an innovative measurement software, intimascope. , 2006, American journal of hypertension.

[56]  M. Palta,et al.  Validation of a carotid intima-media thickness border detection program for use in an office setting. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[57]  J. Stein,et al.  Use of hand-held ultrasound by a nonsonographer clinician to measure carotid intima-media thickness. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[58]  Matthias W. Lorenz,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Cardiovascular Events With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Circulation.