The qualitative detection of decreases in cardiac output

BACKGROUND Cardiac output is a major factor in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis and is difficult to measure with accuracy. This study describes an evidence-based technique, based on physiological changes, which may indicate small changes in cardiac output that cannot be measured by current techniques. METHOD Synchronous changes in blood pressure, heart rate, pulse amplitude and end-tidal carbon dioxide are analysed using runs analysis and a normalisation technique. An evidence-based algorithm was used to detect possible changes in cardiac output and data extracts from 31 consenting patients are presented as examples. RESULTS The decrease in end-tidal carbon dioxide, during steady state ventilation, was greater in those events notified as hypovolaemia associated with a fall in cardiac output than those events notified as hypovolaemia alone. The difference in end-tidal carbon dioxide between the two groups was -0.25 kPa (CI -0.42 to -0.09) p<0.003. DISCUSSION Runs analysis can detect trends in EtCO2 that during steady state ventilation may indicate a decrease in cardiac output. It is a safe technique; no additional hardware is required and the generated alerts only notify the clinician of the possibility of an adverse change. Determination of the rate of clinically significant false positives and negatives requires further work.

[1]  M J Harrison,et al.  Statistics‐based alarms from sequential physiological measurements , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[2]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Thermodilution cardiac output – are three injections enough? , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  D. G. Haryadi,et al.  Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[4]  D. O'Brien,et al.  End-tidal carbon dioxide during extremely low cardiac output. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  M. Weil,et al.  Cardiac output and end‐tidal carbon dioxide , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[6]  L. Critchley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[7]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output , 2009, Critical care.

[8]  B. Reichart,et al.  Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[9]  Jakob Edo Wieringa Statistical process control for serially correlated data , 1999 .

[10]  M. Genoni,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  J. Ornato,et al.  Relationship between cardiac output and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension. , 1990, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  C. Spies,et al.  Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements , 2006, Critical care.