Continuous ambulatory hand force monitoring during manual materials handling using instrumented force shoes and an inertial motion capture suit.

Hand forces (HFs) are commonly measured during biomechanical assessment of manual materials handling; however, it is often a challenge to directly measure HFs in field studies. Therefore, in a previous study we proposed a HF estimation method based on ground reaction forces (GRFs) and body segment accelerations and tested it with laboratory equipment: GFRs were measured with force plates (FPs) and segment accelerations were measured using optical motion capture (OMC). In the current study, we evaluated the HF estimation method based on an ambulatory measurement system, consisting of inertial motion capture (IMC) and instrumented force shoes (FSs). Sixteen participants lifted and carried a 10-kg crate from ground level while 3D full-body kinematics were measured using OMC and IMC, and 3D GRFs were measured using FPs and FSs. We estimated 3D hand force vectors based on: (1) FP+OMC, (2) FP+IMC and (3) FS+IMC. We calculated the root-mean-square differences (RMSDs) between the estimated HFs to reference HFs calculated based on crate kinematics and the GRFs of a FP that the crate was lifted from. Averaged over subjects and across 3D force directions, the HF RMSD ranged between 10-15N when using the laboratory equipment (FP + OMC), 11-18N when using the IMC instead of OMC data (FP+IMC), and 17-21N when using the FSs in combination with IMC (FS + IMC). This error is regarded acceptable for the assessment of spinal loading during manual lifting, as it would results in less than 5% error in peak moment estimates.

[1]  I. Kingma,et al.  Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted? , 2006, Physical therapy.

[2]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Lifting style and participant's sex do not affect optimal inertial sensor location for ambulatory assessment of trunk inclination. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  P. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces , 2005 .

[4]  D. Roetenberg,et al.  Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors , 2009 .

[5]  I. Kingma,et al.  Cumulative Low Back Load at Work as a Risk Factor of Low Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2012, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[6]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[7]  P. de Leva Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Steven A Lavender,et al.  Instrumentation for measuring dynamic spinal load moment exposures in the workplace. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Christian Larue,et al.  Effect of local magnetic field disturbances on inertial measurement units accuracy. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  A Forner-Cordero,et al.  Study of the motion artefacts of skin-mounted inertial sensors under different attachment conditions , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[11]  J H van Dieën,et al.  The effects of ergonomic interventions on low back moments are attenuated by changes in lifting behaviour , 2007, Ergonomics.

[12]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  A force plate based method for the calibration of force/torque sensors. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. Plamondon,et al.  Validation of two 3-D segment models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L(5)/S(1) joint in lifting. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  P. Veltink,et al.  Evaluation of instrumented shoes for ambulatory assessment of ground reaction forces. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[15]  Sunwook Kim,et al.  Performance evaluation of a wearable inertial motion capture system for capturing physical exposures during manual material handling tasks , 2013, Ergonomics.

[16]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Estimation of low back moments from video analysis: a validation study. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[18]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Determination of joint moments with instrumented force shoes in a variety of tasks. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  I. Kingma,et al.  Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model , 1996 .

[20]  Denys Denis,et al.  Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Jack T. Dennerlein,et al.  Estimating dynamic external hand forces during manual materials handling based on ground reaction forces and body segment accelerations. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies , 2011, Ergonomics.

[24]  R. Barrett,et al.  Spinal loads during individual and team lifting , 2002, Ergonomics.

[25]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Estimating the L5S1 flexion/extension moment in symmetrical lifting using a simplified ambulatory measurement system. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory Assessment of Ankle and Foot Dynamics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Working height, block mass and one- vs. two-handed block handling: the contribution to low back and shoulder loading during masonry work , 2009, Ergonomics.