An Overspeed Protection Mechanism for Virtual Coupling in Railway

As a new technology to improve transportation capacity by compressing train tracking interval, virtual coupling (VC) has attracted significant attention from both industry and academia. The traditional overspeed protection mechanism cannot guarantee the safe running for a train fleet. Therefore, in this article, we study two key problems of the overspeed protection mechanism: the limit speed calculation and the safe control for the protection of train in the formation when overspeed occurs. This article describes the calculation methods of limit speed difference (LSD) based on relative coordinates and a collision mitigation approach by minimizing the relative kinetic energy, respectively. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through numerical analysis. The proposed calculation method of limit speed can realize large headway at low speed and small headway at high speed, which can meet the time requirement of switch and route arrangement in station areas. The performance of the model predictive control (MPC) based approach is compared with other two control strategies, i.e. basic adaptive cruise control (ACC) and directly maximum braking control (DBC). The simulation results show that the MPC strategy has the best performance among these three strategies in reducing the total relative kinetic energy of virtually-coupled train formation, followed by the DBC control strategy, and the basic ACC control strategy needs to be improved.

[1]  Daniel Machalaba,et al.  The Future of Rail , 2011 .

[2]  Feng Gao,et al.  Practical String Stability of Platoon of Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Yang Zheng,et al.  Distributed Model Predictive Control for Heterogeneous Vehicle Platoons Under Unidirectional Topologies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[4]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  A model predictive controller for non-cooperative eco-platooning , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[5]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Longitudinal collision mitigation via coordinated braking of multiple vehicles using model predictive control , 2015, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[6]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  A Model Predictive Control Approach for Virtual Coupling in Railways , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Roberto Nardone,et al.  Towards Railway Virtual Coupling , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles & International Transportation Electrification Conference (ESARS-ITEC).

[8]  Tilo Schumann,et al.  Increase Of Capacity On The Shinkansen High-speed Line Using Virtual Coupling , 2017 .

[9]  Rob M.P. Goverde,et al.  A multi-state train-following model for the analysis of virtual coupling railway operations , 2020, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag..

[10]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Data-Driven Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Topological manifold‐based monitoring method for train‐centric virtual coupling control systems , 2020 .

[12]  Ling Liu,et al.  Coordinated Control Method of Virtually Coupled Train Formation Based on Multi Agent System , 2018, Advances in Smart Vehicular Technology, Transportation, Communication and Applications.

[13]  Ronghui Liu,et al.  Cooperative control of high-speed trains for headway regulation: A self-triggered model predictive control based approach , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[14]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles: State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2018, Annu. Rev. Control..

[15]  G. Bikker,et al.  Design and Development of a Future Freight Train Concept – “Virtually Coupled Train Formations” , 2000 .

[16]  Hairong Dong,et al.  Cooperative Prescribed Performance Tracking Control for Multiple High-Speed Trains in Moving Block Signaling System , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Colin Williams,et al.  The next ETCS Level? , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT).

[19]  Hairong Dong,et al.  Distributed Cooperative Cruise Control of Multiple High-Speed Trains Under a State-Dependent Information Transmission Topology , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Ling LIU,et al.  Intelligent Dispatching and Coordinated Control Method at Railway Stations for Virtually Coupled Train Sets* , 2019, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC).

[21]  Meng Wang,et al.  String stability of heterogeneous platoons with non-connected automated vehicles , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[22]  Ding Ke,et al.  MPC based longitudinal coordinated collision avoidance for multiple connected vehicles , 2017 .

[23]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Distributed cruise control of high-speed trains , 2017, J. Frankl. Inst..

[24]  Bin Ning,et al.  Absolute Braking And Relative Distance Braking- Train Operation Control Modes In MovingBlock Systems , 1998 .

[25]  Roberto Nardone,et al.  ERTMS/ETCS Virtual Coupling: Proof of Concept and Numerical Analysis , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Ryo Takagi Synchronisation control of trains on the railway track controlled by the moving block signalling system , 2012 .

[27]  Egidio Quaglietta,et al.  Analysis of Platooning Train Operations under V2V Communication-Based Signaling: Fundamental Modelling and Capacity Impacts of Virtual Coupling , 2019 .